Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33132194›Full record

ArticleHuman movement science2020

Combining wearable sensor signals, machine learning and biomechanics to estimate tibial bone force and damage during running.

Emily S Matijevich, Leon R Scott, Peter Volgyesi, Kendall H Derry, Karl E Zelik

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human movement science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily S MatijevichDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: emily.matijevich@vanderbilt.edu.
Leon R ScottDepartment of Orthopaedics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Peter VolgyesiInstitute for Software Integrated Systems, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Kendall H DerryDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Karl E ZelikDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University · USIntegrated Software (United States) · US

Funding

CPS: Cyber-physically assistive clothing to reduce societal incident of low back pain R01EB028105 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ZELIK, KARL E · 2018 to 2020
$933k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are tremendous opportunities to advance science, clinical care, sports performance, and societal health if we are able to develop tools for monitoring musculoskeletal loading (e.g., forces on bones or muscles) outside the lab. While wearable sensors enable non-invasive monitoring of human movement in applied situations, current commercial wearables do not estimate tissue-level loading on structures inside the body. Here we explore the feasibility of using wearable sensors to estimate tibial bone force during running. First, we used lab-based data and musculoskeletal modeling to estimate tibial force for ten participants running across a range of speeds and slopes. Next, we converted lab-based data to signals feasibly measured with wearables (inertial measurement units on the foot and shank, and pressure-sensing insoles) and used these data to develop two multi-sensor algorithms for estimating peak tibial force: one physics-based and one machine learning. Additionally, to reflect current running wearables that utilize running impact metrics to infer musculoskeletal loading or injury risk, we estimated tibial force using a commonly measured impact metric, the ground reaction force vertical average loading rate (VALR). Using VALR to estimate peak tibial force resulted in a mean absolute percent error of 9.9%, which was no more accurate than a theoretical step counter that assumed the same peak force for every running stride. Our physics-based algorithm reduced error to 5.2%, and our machine learning algorithm reduced error to 2.6%. Further, to gain insights into how force estimation accuracy relates to overuse injury risk, we computed bone damage expected due to a given loading cycle. We found that modest errors in tibial force translated into large errors in bone damage estimates. For example, a 9.9% error in tibial force using VALR translated into 104% error in estimated bone damage. Encouragingly, the physics-based and machine learning algorithms reduced damage errors to 41% and 18%, respectively. This study highlights the exciting potential to combine wearables, musculoskeletal biomechanics and machine learning to develop more accurate tools for monitoring musculoskeletal loading in applied situations.

Indexed as

Machine LearningWearable Electronic DevicesAdultAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaFeasibility StudiesFemaleFootHumansMaleMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaRunningShoesTibiaYoung AdultBone stress injuryInjury risk assessmentOveruse injuriesRunning biomechanicsWearables

Identifiers

PMID33132194
PMCPMC9827619
OpenAlexW3093846139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.