Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33131995›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2022

Mitigation of motion effects in pencil-beam scanning - Impact of repainting on 4D robustly optimized proton treatment plans for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hilda Siregar, Christian Bäumer, Oliver Blanck, Mark Chan, Erik Engwall, Sandija Plaude, Bernhard Spaan, Beate Timmermann, Jörg Wulff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hilda SiregarWest German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Am Mühlenbach 1, 45147 Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, Germany; Technische Universität Dortmund, Otto-Hahn-Str. 4a, 44227 Dortmund, Germany.
Christian BäumerWest German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Am Mühlenbach 1, 45147 Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, Germany; Technische Universität Dortmund, Otto-Hahn-Str. 4a, 44227 Dortmund, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany. Electronic address: christian.baeumer@uk-essen.de.
Oliver BlanckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Saphir Radiosurgery Centre, Güstrow and Frankfurt, Germany.
Mark ChanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Erik EngwallRaySearch Laboratories, Sveavägen 44, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sandija PlaudeWest German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Am Mühlenbach 1, 45147 Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, Germany.
Bernhard SpaanTechnische Universität Dortmund, Otto-Hahn-Str. 4a, 44227 Dortmund, Germany.
Beate TimmermannWest German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Am Mühlenbach 1, 45147 Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany.
Jörg WulffWest German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Am Mühlenbach 1, 45147 Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proton fields delivered by the active scanning technique can be interfered with the intrafractional motion. This in-silico study seeks to mitigate the dosimetric impacts of motion artifacts, especially its interplay with the time-modulated dose delivery. Here four-dimensional (4d) robust optimization and dose repainting, which is the multiple application of the same field with reduced fluence, were combined. Two types of repainting were considered: layered and volumetric repainting. The time-resolved dose calculation, which is necessary to quantify the interplay effect, was integrated into the treatment planning system and validated. Nine clinical cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) showing motion in the range of 0.4-1.5cm were studied. It was found that the repainted delivery of 4D robustly optimized plans reduced the impact of interplay effect as quantified by the homogeneity index within the clinical target volume (CTV) to a tolerable level. Similarly, the fractional over- and underdosage was reduced sufficiently for some HCC cases to achieve the purpose of motion management. This holds true for both investigated types of repainting with small dosimetric advantages of volume repainting over layered repainting. Volume repainting, however, cannot be applied clinically in proton centers with slow energy changes. Thus, it served as a reference in the in-silico evaluation. It is recommended to perform the dynamic dose calculation for individual cases to judge if robust optimization in conjunction with repainting is sufficient to keep the interplay effect within bounds.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsProton TherapyFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyHumansProtonsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedProtonsInterplay effectMotion managementPencil-beam scanningProton therapyRepaintingRobust optimization

Identifiers

PMID33131995
PMCPMC9948857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.