Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33131498›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2020

Influence of community scorecards on maternal and newborn health service delivery and utilization.

Elizabeth Ekirapa Kiracho, Noel Namuhani, Rebecca Racheal Apolot, Christine Aanyu, Aloysuis Mutebi, Moses Tetui, Suzanne N Kiwanuka, Faith Adong Ayen, Dennis Mwesige, Ahmed Bumbha and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mapping the role of patient and public involvement during the different stages of healthcare innovation: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elizabeth Ekirapa KirachoDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, P.O.Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. ekky@musph.ac.ug.ORCID 0000-0001-6938-2068
Noel NamuhaniMakerere University School of Public Health, P.O.Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Rebecca Racheal ApolotDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, P.O.Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Christine AanyuDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, P.O.Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Aloysuis MutebiDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, P.O.Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Moses TetuiDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, P.O.Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Suzanne N KiwanukaDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, P.O.Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Faith Adong AyenDistrict Health Service, Kibuku Local Government, P.O Box 150, Mbale, Uganda.
Dennis MwesigeDistrict Health Service, Kibuku Local Government, P.O Box 150, Mbale, Uganda.
Ahmed BumbhaDistrict Health Service, Kibuku Local Government, P.O Box 150, Mbale, Uganda.
Ligia PainaDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
David H PetersDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe community score card (CSC) is a participatory monitoring and evaluation tool that has been employed to strengthen the mutual accountability of health system and community actors. In this paper we describe the influence of the CSC on selected maternal and newborn service delivery and utilization indicators.

methodsThis was a mixed methods study that used both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. It was implemented in five sub-counties and one town council in Kibuku district in Uganda. Data was collected through 17 key informant interviews and 10 focus group discussions as well as CSC scoring and stakeholder meeting reports. The repeated measures ANOVA test was used to test for statistical significance. Qualitative data was analyzed manually using content analysis. The analysis about the change pathways was guided by the Wild and Harris dimensions of change framework.

resultsThere was an overall improvement in the common indicators across sub-counties in the project area between the 1st and 5th round scores. Almost all the red scores had changed to green or yellow by round five except for availability of drugs and mothers attending Antenatal care (ANC) in the first trimester. There were statistically significant differences in mean scores for men escorting their wives for ante natal care (ANC) (F(4,20) = 5.45, P = 0.01), availability of midwives (F(4,16) =5.77, P < 0.01), availability of delivery beds (F(4,12) =9.00, P < 0.01) and mothers delivering from traditional birth attendants (TBAs), F(4,16) = 3.86, p = 0.02). The qualitative findings suggest that strengthening of citizens' demand, availability of resources through collaborative problem solving, increased awareness about targeted maternal health services and increased top down performance pressure contributed to positive changes as perceived by community members and their leaders. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The community score cards created opportunities for community leaders and communities to work together to identify innovative ways of dealing with the health service delivery and utilization challenges that they face. Local leaders should encourage the availability of safe spaces for dialogue between communities, health workers and leaders where performance and utilization challenges can be identified and solutions proposed and implemented jointly.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services ResearchHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal-Child Health ServicesPregnancyQualitative ResearchSocial ResponsibilityUgandaAccountabilityCommunity score cardsMaternal healthNewborn healthUgandaUtilization

Identifiers

PMID33131498
PMCPMC7604954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.