Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33131436›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

From sequence to information.

Ovidiu Popa, Ellen Oldenburg, Oliver Ebenhöh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ovidiu PopaInstitute of Quantitative and Theoretical Biology, CEPLAS, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ellen OldenburgInstitute of Quantitative and Theoretical Biology, CEPLAS, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
Oliver EbenhöhInstitute of Quantitative and Theoretical Biology, CEPLAS, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today massive amounts of sequenced metagenomic and metatranscriptomic data from different ecological niches and environmental locations are available. Scientific progress depends critically on methods that allow extracting useful information from the various types of sequence data. Here, we will first discuss types of information contained in the various flavours of biological sequence data, and how this information can be interpreted to increase our scientific knowledge and understanding. We argue that a mechanistic understanding of biological systems analysed from different perspectives is required to consistently interpret experimental observations, and that this understanding is greatly facilitated by the generation and analysis of dynamic mathematical models. We conclude that, in order to construct mathematical models and to test mechanistic hypotheses, time-series data are of critical importance. We review diverse techniques to analyse time-series data and discuss various approaches by which time-series of biological sequence data have been successfully used to derive and test mechanistic hypotheses. Analysing the bottlenecks of current strategies in the extraction of knowledge and understanding from data, we conclude that combined experimental and theoretical efforts should be implemented as early as possible during the planning phase of individual experiments and scientific research projects. This article is part of the theme issue 'Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation'.

Indexed as

EcosystemGene Expression ProfilingMetagenomeMetagenomicsTranscriptomeConservation of Natural ResourcesModels, Biologicaldataentropygenomeinformationmodellingsequencetime-series

Identifiers

PMID33131436
PMCPMC7662195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.