Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33131435›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Marine conservation: towards a multi-layered network approach.

Ute Jacob, Andrew Beckerman, Mira Antonijevic, Laura E Dee, Anna Eklöf, Hugh P Possingham, Ross Thompson, Thomas J Webb, Benjamin S Halpern

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ute JacobHelmholtz-Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity at the University of Oldenburg (HIFMB), Ammerländer Heerstrasse 231, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.
Andrew BeckermanDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Mira Antonijevicach and krach GmbH, Branddesign, Grindelberg 17, Hamburg, Germany.
Laura E DeeDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Anna EklöfDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, Linköping 581 83, Sweden.
Hugh P PossinghamSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Ross ThompsonCentre for Applied Water Science, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Thomas J WebbDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Benjamin S HalpernNational Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, 735 State Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93101-5504, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Valuing, managing and conserving marine biodiversity and a full range of ecosystem services is at the forefront of research and policy agendas. However, biodiversity is being lost at up to a thousand times the average background rate. Traditional disciplinary and siloed conservation approaches are not able to tackle this massive loss of biodiversity because they generally ignore or overlook the interactive and dynamic nature of ecosystems processes, limiting their predictability. To conserve marine biodiversity, we must assess the interactions and impacts among biodiversity and ecosystem services (BD-ES). The scaling up in complexity from single species to entire communities is necessary, albeit challenging, for a deeper understanding of how ecosystem services relate to biodiversity and the roles species have in ecosystem service provision. These interactions are challenging to map, let alone fully assess, but network and system-based approaches provide a powerful way to progress beyond those limitations. Here, we introduce a conceptual multi-layered network approach to understanding how ecosystem services supported by biodiversity drive the total service provision, how different stressors impact BD-ES and where conservation efforts should be placed to optimize the delivery of ecosystem services and protection of biodiversity. This article is part of the theme issue 'Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation'.

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemOceans and SeasAnimalsecosystem servicesmarine biodiversitymulti-layer networks

Identifiers

PMID33131435
PMCPMC7662205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.