ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020
The crossover from microscopy to genes in marine diversity: from species to assemblages in marine pelagic copepods.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating molecular methods and biophysical modeling to assess functional connectivity between marine protected areas.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025Article
- DNA Metabarcoding as a Tool to Study Plankton Responses to Warming and Salinity Change in Mesocosms.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Molecular evidence for a new endemic species of Acartia (Copepoda, Calanoida) from the Southeast Pacific coast.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A rare case of human taeniasis caused byParasitology · 2023Article
- Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Know your limits; miniCOI metabarcoding fails with key marine zooplankton taxa.Journal of plankton researchReview
- Of sequences and images - diversity and quantity of Arctic epipelagic zooplankton by an integrative approach.Journal of plankton researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An accurate identification of species and communities is a prerequisite for analysing and recording biodiversity and community shifts. In the context of marine biodiversity conservation and management, this review outlines past, present and forward-looking perspectives on identifying and recording planktonic diversity by illustrating the transition from traditional species identification based on morphological diagnostic characters to full molecular genetic identification of marine assemblages. In this process, the article presents the methodological advancements by discussing progress and critical aspects of the crossover from traditional to novel and future molecular genetic identifications and it outlines the advantages of integrative approaches using the strengths of both morphological and molecular techniques to identify species and assemblages. We demonstrate this process of identifying and recording marine biodiversity on pelagic copepods as model taxon. Copepods are known for their high taxonomic and ecological diversity and comprise a huge variety of behaviours, forms and life histories, making them a highly interesting and well-studied group in terms of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Furthermore, their short life cycles and rapid responses to changing environments make them good indicators and core research components for ecosystem health and status in the light of environmental change. This article is part of the theme issue 'Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.