Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33131369›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Internal Medicine Physicians and Social media: Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes.

Mohammed Nadir Bhuiyan, Jose R Medina-Inojosa, Ivana T Croghan, Jasmine R Marcelin, Karthik Ghosh, Anjali Bhagra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Social media best practices for the spine care professional.North American Spine Society journal · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammed Nadir BhuiyanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jose R Medina-InojosaDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ivana T CroghanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3464-3525
Jasmine R MarcelinUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Karthik GhoshDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Anjali BhagraDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIncreasing adoption of social media have revolutionized communications between individuals, groups, and organizations This research study was designed to assess the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of internal medicine physicians' awareness and engagement with social media (sometimes referred to as #SoMe) within the digital landscape of healthcare delivery.

methodsAn audience-response survey focused on social media "

resultsMost responders were between the ages of 35 and 65 years (79.6%) and female (60.2%). A majority of responders were aware of social media terminology (88.7%), and many had used it personally (46.7%), but only 12% knew how to use social media to search medical topics, 18% used it to network professionally and most (68.9%) had a distrust of social media when it came to the protection of their privacy or their patients' privacy. Overall, about 29.6% indicated an interest in future continued medical education focused on social media (and 27.4% were neutral).

conclusionsApproximately half of the responders used social media but far less engaged its platforms for professional use likely due to privacy related concerns. Distance from academic institutions, where professional social media use is more common likely, played a role in aversion. Awareness of social media's role in healthcare has increased among physicians in practice, however their participation and knowledge of opportunities remains limited.

Indexed as

PhysiciansSocial MediaAdultAgedAttitudeConfidentialityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle Agedfacebookhealthcarepodcastsprimary caresocial mediatwitter

Identifiers

PMID33131369
PMCPMC7607782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.