Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33131192›Full record

SynthesisJournal of occupational health2020

The impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the mental health of healthcare workers in a hospital setting-A Systematic Review.

Jaspinder Sanghera, Nikhil Pattani, Yousuf Hashmi, Kate F Varley, Manikandar Srinivas Cheruvu, Alex Bradley, Joshua R Burke

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of occupational health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. The Impact of Epidemics and Pandemics on the Mental Health of Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. SARS/MERS/SARS-CoV-2 Outbreaks and Burnout Syndrome among Healthcare Workers. An Umbrella Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Vaccines · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jaspinder SangheraBirmingham Medical School, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6859-6002
Nikhil PattaniBirmingham Medical School, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7233-3635
Yousuf HashmiBirmingham Medical School, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0847-4898
Kate F VarleyThe John Goligher Colorectal Surgery Unit, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0569-9837
Manikandar Srinivas CheruvuRobert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9087-0920
Alex BradleySchool of Education and Sociology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-7653
Joshua R BurkeThe John Goligher Colorectal Surgery Unit, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4027-747X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic has subjected healthcare workers (HCWs) to high risk of infection through direct workplace exposure, coupled with increased workload and psychological stress. This review aims to determine the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on mental health outcomes of hospital-based HCWs and formulate recommendations for future action.

methodsA systematic review was performed between 31st December 2019 and 17th June 2020 through Ovid Medline and Embase databases (PROSPERO ID CRD42020181204). Studies were included for review if they investigated the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on mental health outcomes of hospital-based HCWs and used validated psychiatric scoring tools. Prevalence of ICD-10 classified psychiatric disorders was the primary outcome measure.

resultsThe initial search returned 436 articles. Forty-four studies were included in final analysis, with a total of 69,499 subjects. Prevalence ranges of six mental health outcomes were identified: depression 13.5%-44.7%; anxiety 12.3%-35.6%; acute stress reaction 5.2%-32.9%; post-traumatic stress disorder 7.4%-37.4%; insomnia 33.8%-36.1%; and occupational burnout 3.1%-43.0%. Direct exposure to SARS-CoV-2 patients was the most common risk factor identified for all mental health outcomes except occupational burnout. Nurses, frontline HCWs, and HCWs with low social support and fewer years of working experience reported the worst outcomes.

conclusionThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has significantly impacted the mental health of HCWs. Frontline staff demonstrate worse mental health outcomes. Hospitals should be staffed to meet service provision requirements and to mitigate the impact onmental health. This can be improved with access to rapid-response psychiatric teams and should be continually monitored throughout the pandemic and beyond its conclusion.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthAnxiety DisordersBurnout, ProfessionalCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19DepressionFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMental HealthOccupational StressPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPrevalenceRisk AssessmentanxietyburnoutdepressioninsomniaSARS-CoV-2stress

Identifiers

PMID33131192
PMCPMC7603426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.