Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33131027›Full record

Observational studyThe patient2021

Development and Validation of the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ).

Stacie Hudgens, Andrea Phillips-Beyer, Louise Newton, Dalma Seboek Kinter, Heike Benes

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The patient, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03056053 phase2completednot on this map

Multi-center, Single-arm, Open-label Study in Patients With Insomnia Disorder to Validate the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire™ (IDSIQ™)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.Ran2017 to 2017Enrolled113ConditionsInsomnia DisorderArmsZolpidem
NCT03545191 phase3completednot on this map

Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Polysomnography Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of ACT-541468 in Adult and Elderly Subjects With Insomnia Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.Ran2018 to 2020Enrolled930ConditionsInsomnia DisorderArmsDaridorexant 25 mg, Daridorexant 50 mg, Placebo
NCT03575104 phase3completednot on this map

Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Polysomnography Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of ACT-541468 in Adult and Elderly Subjects With Insomnia Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.Ran2018 to 2020Enrolled924ConditionsInsomnia DisorderArmsDaridorexant, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Do Insomnia Treatments Improve Daytime Function?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stacie Hudgens *Clinical Outcomes Solutions, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Andrea Phillips-Beyer *Innovus Consulting Ltd., London, UK.
Louise NewtonClinical Outcomes Solutions, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Dalma Seboek KinterIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Allschwil, Switzerland. dalma.seboek-kinter@idorsia.com.
Heike BenesSomni Bene Institut für Medizinische Forschung und Schlafmedizin Schwerin GmbH, Schwerin, Germany.
Health Outcomes Solutions (United States) · USHelios Hospital Schwerin · DEIdorsia (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveChronic insomnia has major consequences for daytime functioning, yet no fully validated patient-reported outcome instrument for once-daily assessments is available to measure these consequences. This study describes the development and psychometric evaluation of the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ).

methodsThe Daytime Insomnia Symptom Scale (DISS), an existing 20-item instrument for assessing daytime functioning, was modified to give an 18-item version of the IDSIQ (IDSIQ-18) based on iterative qualitative interviews with 54 subjects with insomnia and expert input. The construct validity and other psychometric properties of the IDSIQ-18 were analyzed based on an interventional study (NCT03056053) in which subjects with insomnia received zolpidem (5 or 10 mg) daily for 2 weeks and an observational study among subjects with no diagnosis of insomnia (good sleepers). Participants in both studies completed the IDSIQ-18 daily for 2 weeks. Exit interviews were conducted with a sample of subjects who completed the interventional study to elicit concepts defining the experience of insomnia, to assess understanding of the response scales, and to determine meaningful change thresholds. Exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis were conducted to further assess the structure and latent model for the scoring of the final IDSIQ instrument. Further psychometric evaluation of the final IDSIQ was then conducted.

resultsSubjects in both the interventional study (N = 114) and observational study (N = 103) were predominantly female (65% for subjects with insomnia and 60% for good sleepers). Mean age was 51 years for subjects with insomnia and 45 years for good sleepers. Subjects in the exit interviews (N = 41) demonstrated a good understanding of the IDSIQ-18 response scales. Day 1 mean scores were higher (worse) in subjects with insomnia compared with good sleepers. Based on inter-item correlation, exploratory factor, and Rasch analyses and review of the qualitative data, four items were removed. This yielded the final IDSIQ, with 14 items comprising three domains: Alert/Cognition, Mood, and Sleepiness. The domain structure was determined in a confirmatory factor analysis. Evidence of internal consistency reliability was strong: day 1 Cronbach's alpha was 0.917 for IDSIQ total score and 0.806-0.918 for the domains. Test-retest reliability, assessed for subjects with insomnia with no change on the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Severity scale between day 1 and day 8, was also good (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.856-0.911). Meaningful change thresholds derived for this sample using anchor-based approaches were 20 for IDSIQ total score, 9 for the Alert/Cognition domain, 4 for the Mood domain, and 4 for the Sleepiness domain.

conclusionsThese studies, which closely followed Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Industry on patient-reported outcome measures, support use of the IDSIQ as a fit-for-purpose measure for deriving valid and reliable endpoints in insomnia clinical research trials and real-world studies.

Indexed as

Sleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33131027
PMCPMC7884372
OpenAlexW3095371938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.