Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33130983›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2020

Co-transplantation of Schwann cells and neural stem cells in the laminin-chitosan-PLGA nerve conduit to repair the injured recurrent laryngeal nerve in SD rats.

Yu Li, Yongzhi Men, Baoxin Wang, Xinwei Chen, Ziwei Yu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Research progress in auxiliary components of nerve conduit for treating peripheral nerve injuries].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Therapeutic role of neural stem cells in neurological diseases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Spinal cord injury: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu LiDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, PR China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9302-8800
Yongzhi MenDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, PR China.
Baoxin WangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, PR China.
Xinwei ChenDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, PR China.
Ziwei YuDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, PR China. david545yu@163.com.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

Major Research Plan 81170925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to investigate the possibility and efficacy of recurrent laryngeal nerve repair by transplantation of co-cultured Schwann cells and neural stem cells (NSCs) in laminin-chitosan-poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (laminin-chitosan-PLGA) nerve conduits in rats. A laminin-chitosan-PLGA conduit was used in a rat recurrent laryngeal nerve transection model. The rat recurrent laryngeal nerve was dissected to generate a 5  mm defect. Then, a laminin-chitosan-PLGA nerve conduit with or without Schwann cells and NSCs in the lumen was transplanted into the defect. A total of 96 female rats were randomised into six groups: co-culture of NSCs and Schwann cells in the nerve conduit group (CO), Schwann cells only in the nerve conduit group (SC), neural stem cells only in the nerve conduit group (NSC-only), nerve conduit group (null), autologous nerve graft group (autograft) and sham operation group (sham). Regenerated nerves were evaluated by histological and functional assessment at 8 and 12 weeks after surgery. The diameter and area of the regenerated myelin sheath, as well as the secretion of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor in laryngeal muscle or regenerated nerve tissue in the CO group, were significantly better than they were in the SC, NSC-only and null groups (all P values  <  0.05). Immunofluorescence showed that the CO group had significantly more neurofilament-200 immunoreactive and S-100 immunoreactive fibres than the SC, NSC-only and null groups (all P values  <  0.05). The performance of the CO groups and autograft groups was found to be similar by laryngoscopy. Arytenoid cartilage motion recovery in these two groups was significantly better than it was in the other groups (all P values  <  0.05). Our results indicated that co-culture of Schwann cells and NSCs in laminin-chitosan-PLGA conduits might promote injured nerve regeneration. This method might be a promising alternative for defective nerve repair.

Indexed as

AnimalsChitosanCoculture TechniquesFemaleLamininMicroscopy, FluorescenceNerve RegenerationNerve TissueNeural Stem CellsPolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecurrent Laryngeal NerveSchwann CellsVocal CordsChitosanLamininPolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer

Identifiers

PMID33130983
OpenAlexW3096013528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.