ArticleThe protein journal2020
Integrated In Silico-In Vitro Identification and Optimization of Bone Morphogenic Protein-2 Armpit Epitope as Its Antagonist Binding Site.
Article in The protein journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural Mapping of BMP Conformational Epitopes and Bioengineering Design of Osteogenic Peptides to Specifically Target the Epitope-Binding Sites.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone morphogenic protein-2 (BMP-2) is the most documented member of BMP family and plays a crucial role in bone formation and growth. In this study, we systematically analyze and compare the complex crystal structures and interaction properties of BMP-2 with its cognate receptors BMPR-I/BMPR-II and with its natural antagonist crossveinless-2 (CV-2) using an integrated in silico-in vitro strategy. It is found that the antagonist-binding site is not fully overlapped with the two receptor-binding sites on BMP-2 surface; the antagonist can competitively disrupt BMP-2-BMPR-II interaction using a blocking-out-of-site manner, but has no substantial influence on BMP-2-BMPR-I interaction. Here, the antagonist-binding site is assigned as a new functional epitope armpit to differ from the traditional conformational epitope wrist and linear epitope knuckle at receptor-binding sites. Structural analysis reveals that the armpit comprises three sequentially discontinuous, structurally vicinal peptide segments, separately corresponding to a loop region and two β-strands crawling on the protein surface. The three segments cannot work independently when splitting from the protein context, but can restore binding capability to CV-2 if they are connected to a single peptide. A systematic combination of different-length polyglycine linkers between these segments obtains a series of designed single peptides, from which several peptides that can potently interact with the armpit-recognition site of CV-2 with high affinity and specificity are identified using energetic analysis and fluorescence assay; they are expected to target BMP-2-CV-2 interaction in a self-inhibitory manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.