ArticleBiophysical journal2020
Constitutive Model of Erythrocyte Membranes with Distributions of Spectrin Orientations and Lengths.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic mechanisms for membrane skeleton transitions.Journal of cell science · 2025Article
- Dynamic mechanisms for membrane skeleton transitions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Effective cell membrane tension protects red blood cells against malaria invasion.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Energy Dissipation in the Human Red Cell Membrane.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- A particle-based computational model to analyse remodelling of the red blood cell cytoskeleton during malaria infections.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Nanoscale dynamics of actin filaments in the red blood cell membrane skeleton.Molecular biology of the cell · 2022Article
- Development of Mechanical Stability in Late-Stage Embryonic Erythroid Cells: Insights From Fluorescence Imaged Micro-Deformation Studies.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present an analytical hyperelastic constitutive model of the red blood cell (erythrocyte) membrane based on recently improved characterizations of density and microscopic structure of its spectrin network from proteomics and cryo-electron tomography. The model includes distributions of both orientations and natural lengths of spectrin and updated copy numbers of proteins. By applying finite deformation to the spectrin network, we obtain the total free energy and stresses in terms of invariants of shear and area deformation. We generalize an expression of the initial shear modulus, which is independent of the number of molecular orientations within the network and also derive a simplified version of the model. We apply the model and its simplified version to analyze micropipette aspiration computationally and analytically and explore the effect of local cytoskeletal density change. We also explore the discrepancies among shear modulus values measured using different experimental techniques reported in the literature. We find that the model exhibits hardening behavior and can explain many of these discrepancies. Moreover, we find that the distribution of natural lengths plays a crucial role in the hardening behavior when the correct copy numbers of proteins are used. The initial shear modulus values we obtain using our current model (5.9-15.6 pN/μm) are close to the early estimates (6-9 pN/μm). This new, to our knowledge, constitutive model establishes a direct connection between the molecular structure of spectrin networks and constitutive laws and also defines a new picture of a much denser spectrin network than assumed in prior studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.