Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33129894›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroscience methods2021

Towards in vivo g-ratio mapping using MRI: Unifying myelin and diffusion imaging.

Siawoosh Mohammadi, Martina F Callaghan

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Unsupervised Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for the Assessment of ASD Biomarkers.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Siawoosh MohammadiDepartment of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: s.mohammadi@uke.de.
Martina F CallaghanWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK.
University College London · GBUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R000050/1Wellcome Trust 203147/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe g-ratio, quantifying the comparative thickness of the myelin sheath encasing an axon, is a geometrical invariant that has high functional relevance because of its importance in determining neuronal conduction velocity. Advances in MRI data acquisition and signal modelling have put in vivo mapping of the g-ratio, across the entire white matter, within our reach. This capacity would greatly increase our knowledge of the nervous system: how it functions, and how it is impacted by disease. NEW

methodThis is the second review on the topic of g-ratio mapping using MRI.

resultsThis review summarizes the most recent developments in the field, while also providing methodological background pertinent to aggregate g-ratio weighted mapping, and discussing pitfalls associated with these approaches. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsUsing simulations based on recently published data, this review reveals caveats to the state-of-the-art calibration methods that have been used for in vivo g-ratio mapping. It highlights the need to estimate both the slope and offset of the relationship between these MRI-based markers and the true myelin volume fraction if we are really to achieve the goal of precise, high sensitivity g-ratio mapping in vivo. Other challenges discussed in this review further evidence the need for gold standard measurements of human brain tissue from ex vivo histology.

conclusionsWe conclude that the quest to find the most appropriate MRI biomarkers to enable in vivo g-ratio mapping is ongoing, with the full potential of many novel techniques yet to be investigated.

Indexed as

Myelin SheathWhite MatterAxonsBrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBiophysical modellingDiffusion MRIg-ratioIn-vivo histology using MRIMagnetisation transfer imagingMulti-parameter mappingMyelin, axon, and fiber volume fractionsMyelin water imaging

Identifiers

PMID33129894
PMCPMC7840525
OpenAlexW3029922297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.