Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33129831›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2020

TREAP: A New Topological Approach to Drug Target Inference.

Muying Wang, Lauren L Luciani, Heeju Noh, Ericka Mochan, Jason E Shoemaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muying WangDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Lauren L LucianiDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Heeju NohDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York; Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ericka MochanDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Mathematics and Data Analytics, Carlow University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jason E ShoemakerDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; The McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: jason.shoemaker@pitt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 50% of drugs fail in stage 3 clinical trials, many because of a poor understanding of the drug's mechanisms of action (MoA). A better comprehension of drug MoA will significantly improve research and development (R&D). Current proposed algorithms, such as ProTINA and DeMAND, can be overly complex. Additionally, they are unable to predict whether the drug-induced gene expression or the topology of the networks used to model gene regulation primarily impacts accurate drug target inference. In this work, we evaluate how network and gene expression data affect ProTINA's accuracy. We find that network topology predominantly determines the accuracy of ProTINA's predictions. We further show that the size of an interaction network and/or selecting cell-specific networks has a limited effect on accuracy. We then demonstrate that a specific network topology measure, betweenness, can be used to improve drug target prediction. Based on these results, we create a new algorithm, TREAP, that combines betweenness values and adjusted p-values for target inference. TREAP offers an alternative approach to drug target inference and is advantageous because it is not computationally demanding, provides easy-to-interpret results, and is often more accurate at predicting drug targets than current state-of-the-art approaches.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPharmaceutical PreparationsComputational BiologyGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID33129831
PMCPMC7732766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.