ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2021
Central Visual Field Defects in Patients with Distinct Glaucomatous Optic Disc Phenotypes.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ocular Blood Flow in Eyes with Myopia and Glaucoma: From Pathophysiology to Clinical Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Comparative analysis of the optic nerve microvasculature between different optic disc phenotypes of normal-tension glaucoma patients.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Genetic Aspects of Glaucoma: An Updated Review.Current molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Phenotypic expressions of the optic disc in primary open-angle glaucoma.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Glaucoma Severity and Progression Using Imo/TEMPO Screening Program.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
- Central visual field in glaucoma: An updated review.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- Visual field patterns in glaucoma: A systematic review.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
- Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging in Glaucoma.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate central visual field (VF) defects among 4 phenotypes of glaucomatous optic discs.
designCross-sectional study.
methodsOptic disc phenotypes were determined in eyes with definite or suspected glaucoma that had a 24-2 VF with mean deviation (MD) better than -12 dB and a 10-2 VF. 10-2 VFs were classified as abnormal based on a cluster criterion. Additionally, the average of the total deviation values at each 10-2 test point was compared by optic disc phenotype.
resultsThe following 4 glaucomatous optic disc phenotypes were identified in 448 eyes of 309 patients: focal ischemic (FI) (n = 121); generalized cup enlargement (GE) (n = 109); myopic glaucoma (MY) (n = 66); and senile sclerotic (SS) (n = 152). Although 24-2 VF MD values were similar among optic disc phenotypes, GE eyes had higher 10-2 VF MD (P = .004), as well as lower 24-2 VF pattern standard deviations (PSD) (P < .001) and VF 10-2 PSD (P < .001) than the other phenotypes. The prevalence of an abnormal VF 10-2 was highest in FI eyes (78.5%) and lowest in GE eyes (50.5%) (P < .001). In glaucoma suspects, the prevalence of an abnormal 10-2 VF was highest in the MY eyes (31.2%) and FI eyes (23.5%) and lowest in GE eyes (8.6%). In mild glaucoma, the prevalence of abnormal 10-2 VF test results was highest in FI eyes (79.2%) and lowest in GE eyes (44.4%) (P = .013).
conclusionsThe severity and prevalence of central VF loss varied among different glaucomatous optic disc phenotypes. Glaucomatous eyes with FI and MY optic disc phenotypes are more likely to have 10-2 VF loss, particularly in early disease, and especially may benefit from testing with both 10-2 and 24-2 VF tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.