Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33129685›Full record

ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP2021

An evaluation of the spread and scale of PatientToc™ from primary care to community pharmacy practice for the collection of patient-reported outcomes: A study protocol.

Margie E Snyder, Betty Chewning, David Kreling, Susan M Perkins, Lyndee M Knox, Omolola A Adeoye-Olatunde, Heather A Jaynes, Jon C Schommer, Matthew M Murawski, Nisaratana Sangasubana and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Margie E SnyderPurdue University College of Pharmacy, Fifth Third Bank Building, 640 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. Electronic address: snyderme@purdue.edu.
Betty ChewningUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, 2523 Rennebohm Hall, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53705-2222, USA. Electronic address: betty.chewning@wisc.edu.
David KrelingUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, 2523 Rennebohm Hall, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53705-2222, USA. Electronic address: david.kreling@wisc.edu.
Susan M PerkinsIndiana University School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, 410 West 10th Street, Suite 3000, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. Electronic address: sperkin1@iu.edu.
Lyndee M KnoxL.A. Net Community Health Resources Network, 800 East Ocean Blvd, Suite 104, Long Beach, CA, 90802(562), USA. Electronic address: Lyndee.knox@gmail.com.
Omolola A Adeoye-OlatundePurdue University College of Pharmacy, Fifth Third Bank Building, 640 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. Electronic address: adeoyeo@purdue.edu.
Heather A JaynesPurdue University College of Pharmacy, Fifth Third Bank Building, 640 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. Electronic address: hrwoblew@iu.edu.
Jon C SchommerUniversity of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy 7-159 Weaver-Densford Hall 308 Harvard St. SE Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. Electronic address: schom010@umn.edu.
Matthew M MurawskiPurdue University College of Pharmacy, Fifth Third Bank Building, 640 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. Electronic address: murawski@purdue.edu.
Nisaratana SangasubanaSonderegger Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 777 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. Electronic address: nsangasubana@gmail.com.
Lisa A HillmanUniversity of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy 7-159 Weaver-Densford Hall 308 Harvard St. SE Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. Electronic address: hill0667@umn.edu.
Geoffrey M CurranUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, 4301 W. Markham St., #522-4, Little Rock, AR, 72205-7199, USA. Electronic address: currangeoffreym@uams.edu.
University of Indianapolis · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Minnesota · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

Expanding Translational Research in ArkansasUL1TR003107 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI JAMES, LAURA P · 2019 to 2023
$21.6M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteTL1TR001107 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
An Evaluation of the Spread and Scale of PatientToc from Primary Care to Community Pharmacy Practice for the Collection of Patient-Reported OutcomesR18HS025943 · AHRQ · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, MARGIE E · 2019 to 2021
$1.4M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS025943NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001107NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication non-adherence is a problem of critical importance, affecting approximately 50% of all persons taking at least one regularly scheduled prescription medication and costing the United States more than $100 billion annually. Traditional data sources for identifying and resolving medication non-adherence in community pharmacies include prescription fill histories. However, medication possession does not necessarily mean patients are taking their medications as prescribed. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), measuring adherence challenges pertaining to both remembering and intention to take medication, offer a rich data source for pharmacists and prescribers to use to resolve medication non-adherence. PatientToc™ is a PROs collection software developed to facilitate collection of PROs data from low-literacy and non-English speaking patients in Los Angeles.

objectivesThis study will evaluate the spread and scale of PatientToc™ from primary care to community pharmacies for the collection and use of PROs data pertaining to medication adherence.

methodsThe following implementation and evaluation steps will be conducted: 1) a pre-implementation developmental formative evaluation to determine community pharmacy workflow and current practices for identifying and resolving medication non-adherence, potential barriers and facilitators to PatientToc™ implementation, and to create a draft implementation toolkit, 2) two plan-do-study-act cycles to refine an implementation toolkit for spreading and scaling implementation of PatientToc™ in community pharmacies, and 3) a comprehensive, theory-driven evaluation of the quality of care, implementation, and patient health outcomes of spreading and scaling PatientToc™ to community pharmacies. EXPECTED IMPACT: This research will inform long-term collection and use of PROs data pertaining to medication adherence in community pharmacies.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesPharmaciesPharmacyHumansMedication AdherencePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPharmacistsPrimary Health CareUnited StatesCommunity pharmacyHealth information technologyPatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID33129685
PMCPMC7656051
OpenAlexW3017908882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.