Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33129332›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

A critical realist evaluation of an integrated care project for vulnerable families in Sydney, Australia.

E Tennant, E Miller, K Costantino, D De Souza, H Coupland, P Fotheringham, J Eastwood

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

E TennantHealthy Homes and Neighbourhoods Integrated Care Initiative, Community Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, 24 Liverpool Road, Croydon, NSW, 2132, Australia.
E MillerHealthy Homes and Neighbourhoods Integrated Care Initiative, Community Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, 24 Liverpool Road, Croydon, NSW, 2132, Australia.
K CostantinoHealthy Homes and Neighbourhoods Integrated Care Initiative, Community Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, 24 Liverpool Road, Croydon, NSW, 2132, Australia.
D De SouzaCentre for Research in Education, Torrens University Australia, Flinders Street Campus, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
H CouplandDrug Health Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Level 6, King George V Building Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
P FotheringhamHealthy Homes and Neighbourhoods Integrated Care Initiative, Community Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, 24 Liverpool Road, Croydon, NSW, 2132, Australia.
J EastwoodHealthy Homes and Neighbourhoods Integrated Care Initiative, Community Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, 24 Liverpool Road, Croydon, NSW, 2132, Australia. john.eastwood@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1549-4368
Sydney Local Health District · AUNew South Wales Department of Health · AUThe University of Sydney · AUTorrens University Australia · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthy Homes and Neighbourhoods (HHAN) Integrated Care Initiative was established to improve the care of families with complex health and social needs who reside in Sydney Local Health District. HHAN seeks to provide long-term multi-disciplinary care coordination as well as enhance capacity building and promote integrated care. The critical realist study reported here is part of the longitudinal development and evaluation of complex integrated health and social care interventions in Sydney, Australia.

methodsWe describe the qualitative component of a critical realist pilot case study aimed at exploring, explaining and refining emerging HHAN programme theories in relation to care coordination. Qualitative interviews were undertaken with HHAN clients (n = 12), staff and other stakeholders (n = 21). Interviews and coding used a context (C), mechanism (M) and outcome (O) framework. Inductive, deductive, retroductive and abductive modes of reasoning were used with the CMO heuristic tool to inform the developing programme theory.

resultsThe mechanisms underpinning effective engagement of clients by care coordinators included: building trust, leveraging other family, social and organisational relationships, meeting clients on their own terms, demonstrating staff effectiveness as quickly as possible, and client empowerment. Mechanisms for enhancing care integration included knowledge transfer activities and shared learning among collaborators, structural and cultural changes, enhancing mutual respect, co-location of multidisciplinary and/or interagency staff and cultivating faith in positive change among staff.

conclusionsUse of a critical realism case study approach served to elucidate the varied influences of contexts and mechanisms on programme outcomes, to highlight what works for whom and in what context. Findings supported the initial programme theory that engagement and trust building with clients, alongside enhanced collaboration and integration of services, improved outcomes for vulnerable families with complex needs. Further research is needed to explore the cost-effectiveness of integrated care initiatives, in view of the long term nature of service provision and the risk of staff burnout.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedAustraliaFamilyFemaleHealth PromotionHumansCritical realismDesignEngagementIntegrated care

Identifiers

PMID33129332
PMCPMC7603742
OpenAlexW3097272703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.