Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33129307›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2020

Epigenome-wide DNA methylation and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review.

Kaoutar Ennour-Idrissi, Dzevka Dragic, Francine Durocher, Caroline Diorio

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Ten Years of EWAS.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaoutar Ennour-IdrissiDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Dzevka DragicDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Francine DurocherLaval University Cancer Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Caroline DiorioDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada. Caroline.Diorio@crchudequebec.ulaval.ca.
Université Laval · CA

Funding

Canadian Cancer Society 702501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA methylation is a potential biomarker for early detection of breast cancer. However, robust evidence of a prospective relationship between DNA methylation patterns and breast cancer risk is still lacking. The objective of this study is to provide a systematic analysis of the findings of epigenome-wide DNA methylation studies on breast cancer risk, in light of their methodological strengths and weaknesses.

methodsWe searched major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL) from inception up to 30th June 2019, for observational or intervention studies investigating the association between epigenome-wide DNA methylation (using the HM450k or EPIC BeadChip), measured in any type of human sample, and breast cancer risk. A pre-established protocol was drawn up following the Cochrane Reviews rigorous methodology. Study selection, data abstraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by at least two investigators. A qualitative synthesis and systematic comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of studies was performed.

resultsOverall, 20 studies using the HM450k BeadChip were included, 17 of which had measured blood-derived DNA methylation. There was a consistent trend toward an association of global blood-derived DNA hypomethylation and higher epigenetic age with higher risk of breast cancer. The strength of associations was modest for global hypomethylation and relatively weak for most of epigenetic age algorithms. Differences in length of follow-up periods may have influenced the ability to detect associations, as studies reporting follow-up periods shorter than 10 years were more likely to observe an association with global DNA methylation. Probe-wise differential methylation analyses identified between one and 806 differentially methylated CpGs positions in 10 studies. None of the identified differentially methylated sites overlapped between studies. Three studies used breast tissue DNA and suffered major methodological issues that precludes any conclusion. Overall risk of bias was critical mainly because of incomplete control of confounding. Important issues relative to data preprocessing could have limited the consistency of results.

conclusionsGlobal DNA methylation may be a short-term predictor of breast cancer risk. Further studies with rigorous methodology are needed to determine spatial distribution of DNA hypomethylation and identify differentially methylated sites associated with risk of breast cancer. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020147244.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBreast cancer riskDNA methylationEpigenome-wideHM450kSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33129307
PMCPMC7603741
OpenAlexW3096970192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.