SynthesisBMC cancer2020
Epigenome-wide DNA methylation and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk: a prospective nested case-control study.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Mammo-AGE: deep learning estimation of breast age from mammograms.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Trace element-linked DNA methylation sites and their association with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases: EPIC-Potsdam cohort study.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- Deciphering the prognostic impact of aberrant DNA methylation on ANGPT1 gene in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Tumour DNA methylation markers associated with breast cancer survival: a replication study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Article
- Emerging Role of Epigenetic Modifiers in Breast Cancer Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Response.Cancers · 2023Review
- DNA methylation in peripheral blood leukocytes for the association with glucose metabolism and invasive breast cancer.Clinical epigenetics · 2023Article
- Multimodal analysis of genome-wide methylation, copy number aberrations, and end motif signatures enhances detection of early-stage breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- A Deep Survival EWAS approach estimating risk profile based on pre-diagnostic DNA methylation: An application to breast cancer time to diagnosis.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Association of mammographic density with blood DNA methylation.Epigenetics · 2022Article
- Epigenetic Factors as Etiological Agents, Diagnostic Markers, and Therapeutic Targets for Luminal Breast Cancer.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Ten Years of EWAS.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Review
- Impact of Stilbenes as Epigenetic Modulators of Breast Cancer Risk and Associated Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- The emerging role of RNA N6-methyladenosine methylation in breast cancer.Biomarker research · 2021Review
- DNA Methylation and Breast Cancer Risk: An Epigenome-Wide Study of Normal Breast Tissue and Blood.Cancers · 2020Article
- Epigenetic Mechanisms in Breast Adenocarcinoma: Novel DNA Methylation Patterns.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDNA methylation is a potential biomarker for early detection of breast cancer. However, robust evidence of a prospective relationship between DNA methylation patterns and breast cancer risk is still lacking. The objective of this study is to provide a systematic analysis of the findings of epigenome-wide DNA methylation studies on breast cancer risk, in light of their methodological strengths and weaknesses.
methodsWe searched major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL) from inception up to 30th June 2019, for observational or intervention studies investigating the association between epigenome-wide DNA methylation (using the HM450k or EPIC BeadChip), measured in any type of human sample, and breast cancer risk. A pre-established protocol was drawn up following the Cochrane Reviews rigorous methodology. Study selection, data abstraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by at least two investigators. A qualitative synthesis and systematic comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of studies was performed.
resultsOverall, 20 studies using the HM450k BeadChip were included, 17 of which had measured blood-derived DNA methylation. There was a consistent trend toward an association of global blood-derived DNA hypomethylation and higher epigenetic age with higher risk of breast cancer. The strength of associations was modest for global hypomethylation and relatively weak for most of epigenetic age algorithms. Differences in length of follow-up periods may have influenced the ability to detect associations, as studies reporting follow-up periods shorter than 10 years were more likely to observe an association with global DNA methylation. Probe-wise differential methylation analyses identified between one and 806 differentially methylated CpGs positions in 10 studies. None of the identified differentially methylated sites overlapped between studies. Three studies used breast tissue DNA and suffered major methodological issues that precludes any conclusion. Overall risk of bias was critical mainly because of incomplete control of confounding. Important issues relative to data preprocessing could have limited the consistency of results.
conclusionsGlobal DNA methylation may be a short-term predictor of breast cancer risk. Further studies with rigorous methodology are needed to determine spatial distribution of DNA hypomethylation and identify differentially methylated sites associated with risk of breast cancer. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020147244.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.