Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33129305›Full record

Observational studyBMC palliative care2020

Validation of the Palliative Prognostic Index, Performance Status-Based Palliative Prognostic Index and Chinese Prognostic Scale in a home palliative care setting for patients with advanced cancer in China.

Jun Zhou, Sitao Xu, Ziye Cao, Jing Tang, Xiang Fang, Ling Qin, Fangping Zhou, Yuzhen He, Xueren Zhong, Mingcai Hu and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Opioid consumption, availability, and policy alignment in primary hospice and palliative care in China: a multicomponent comparative analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jun ZhouDepartment of Spine Surgery, Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Sitao XuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Ziye CaoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Jing TangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Xiang FangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Ling QinDepartment of Spine Surgery, Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Fangping ZhouDepartment of Nursing, Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Yuzhen HeDepartment of Nursing, Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Xueren ZhongDepartment of Spine Surgery, Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Mingcai HuHospice center of Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Yan WangEmergency rescue command center of Shaoguan city, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Fengjuan LuHospice center of Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China.
Yongzheng BaoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Xiangheng DaiDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. daixiangheng@163.com.
Qiang WuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China. sgwuqiang@sina.com.

Funding

Medical and Health Scientific Research Project of Science and Technology Bureau of Shaoguan City 2019sn003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe predictive value of the prognostic tool for patients with advanced cancer is uncertain in mainland China, especially in the home-based palliative care (HPC) setting. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI), the Performance Status-Based Palliative Prognostic Index (PS-PPI), and the Chinese Prognosis Scale (ChPS) for patients with advanced cancer in the HPC setting in mainland China.

methodsPatients with advanced cancer admitted to the hospice center of Yuebei People's Hospital between January 2014 and December 2018 were retrospectively calculated the scores according to the three prognostic tools. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival times among different risk groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the predictive value. The accuracy of 21-, 42- and 90-day survival was compared among the three prognostic tools.

resultsA total of 1863 patients were included. Survival time among the risk groups of all prognostic tools was significantly different from each other except for the PPI. The AUROC of the ChPS was significantly higher than that of the PPI and PS-PPI for 7-, 14, 21-, 42-, 90-, 120-, 150- and 180-day survival (P < 0.05). The AUROC of the PPI and PS-PPI were not significantly different from each other (P > 0.05).

conclusionsThe ChPS is more suitable than the PPI and PS-PPI for advanced cancer patients in the HPC setting. More researches are needed to verify the predictive value of the ChPS, PPI, and PS-PPI in the HPC setting in the future.

Indexed as

PrognosisAgedArea Under CurveChinaFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPalliative CareRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSeverity of Illness IndexAdvanced CancerChinese prognosis scaleHome-based palliative care settingPalliative prognostic indexPerformance status–based palliative prognostic indexValidation

Identifiers

PMID33129305
PMCPMC7603699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.