Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33128644›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2020

One out of ten: low sampling efficiency of cloth dragging challenges abundance estimates of questing ticks.

Siiri Nyrhilä, Jani J Sormunen, Satu Mäkelä, Ella Sippola, Eero J Vesterinen, Tero Klemola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A dataset of the abundance ofBiodiversity data journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Siiri NyrhiläDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland.
Jani J SormunenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6763-8477
Satu MäkeläDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland.
Ella SippolaDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland.
Eero J VesterinenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3665-5802
Tero KlemolaDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland. tero.klemola@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8510-329X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) act as important vectors of zoonotic pathogens. For instance, Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. spirochetes pose a severe health risk as aetiological agents of Lyme borreliosis. Commonly, to study the abundance of questing (host-seeking) ticks, a 1 m

Indexed as

Borrelia burgdorferiIxodesLyme DiseaseAnimalsFinlandNymphBorreliaCloth draggingIxodes ricinusSampling efficiencyTick-borne pathogen

Identifiers

PMID33128644
PMCPMC7686165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.