Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33128598›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Diffusion and perfusion MRI radiomics obtained from deep learning segmentation provides reproducible and comparable diagnostic model to human in post-treatment glioblastoma.

Ji Eun Park, Sungwon Ham, Ho Sung Kim, Seo Young Park, Jihye Yun, Hyunna Lee, Seung Hong Choi, Namkug Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Radiomics in glioma: emerging trends and challenges.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Immune checkpoint inhibition: a future guided by radiology.The British journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ji Eun Park *Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Sungwon Ham *Department of Convergence Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Ho Sung KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea. radhskim@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9477-7421
Seo Young ParkDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Jihye YunDepartment of Convergence Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyunna LeeHealth Innovation Big Data Center, Asan Institute for Life Science, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung Hong ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Namkug KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Ulsan College · KRAsan Medical Center · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

National Research Council of Science and Technology NRF-2020R1A2B5B01001707National Research Council of Science and Technology NRF-2020R1A2C4001748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDeep learning-based automatic segmentation (DLAS) helps the reproducibility of radiomics features, but its effect on radiomics modeling is unknown. We therefore evaluated whether DLAS can robustly extract anatomical and physiological MRI features, thereby assisting in the accurate assessment of treatment response in glioblastoma patients.

methodsA DLAS model was trained on 238 glioblastomas and validated on an independent set of 98 pre- and 86 post-treatment glioblastomas from two tertiary hospitals. A total of 1618 radiomics features from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (CE-T1w) and histogram features from apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) mapping were extracted. The diagnostic performance of radiomics features and ADC and CBV parameters for identifying treatment response was tested using area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristics analysis. Feature reproducibility was tested using a 0.80 cutoff for concordance correlation coefficients.

resultsReproducibility was excellent for ADC and CBV features (ICC, 0.82-0.99) and first-order features (pre- and post-treatment, 100% and 94.1% remained), but lower for texture (79.0% and 69.1% remained) and wavelet-transformed (81.8% and 74.9% remained) features of CE-T1w. DLAS-based radiomics showed similar performance to human-performed segmentations in internal validation (AUC, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.64-0.99] vs. AUC, 0.81 [0.60-1.00], p = 0.80), but slightly lower performance in external validation (AUC, 0.78 [0.61-0.95] vs. AUC, 0.65 [0.46-0.84], p = 0.23).

conclusionDLAS-based feature extraction showed high reproducibility for first-order features from anatomical and physiological MRI, and comparable diagnostic performance to human manual segmentations in the identification of pseudoprogression, supporting the utility of DLAS in quantitative MRI analysis. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning-based automatic segmentation (DLAS) enables fast and robust feature extraction from diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI. • DLAS showed high reproducibility in first-order feature extraction from anatomical, diffusion, and perfusion MRI across two centers. • DLAS-based radiomics features showed comparable diagnostic accuracy to manual segmentations in post-treatment glioblastoma.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGlioblastomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPerfusionReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesGlioblastomaMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingReproducibility of results

Identifiers

PMID33128598
OpenAlexW3095147456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.