Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33128595›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2021

Immune checkpoint inhibition in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Gianluigi Califano, Idir Ouzaid, Paolo Verze, Jean-Francois Hermieu, Vincenzo Mirone, Evanguelos Xylinas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gianluigi CalifanoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Idir OuzaidDepartment of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France.
Paolo VerzeDepartment of Medicine and Surgery "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Urology Unit, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Jean-Francois HermieuDepartment of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France.
Vincenzo MironeDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Evanguelos XylinasDepartment of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France. evanguelosxylinas@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9440-4895
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImmunotherapy is changing the way we think about and treat urothelial carcinoma (UC). The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway inhibition has shown robust efficacy, associated with an acceptable toxicity profile, in patients with locally advanced and metastatic unresectable disease, addressing a high decades-old unmet medical need. MATERIAL AND

methodsUsing the Pubmed database, we conducted a literature review for English written published articles up to June 2020. The highest available evidence for the immunotherapy treatment of UC with ICIs were evaluated. The leading phase one, two and three clinical trials were considered for inclusion (n = 12). Patient's data were extracted from studies depicting the UTUC subpopulation.

resultsTwo monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1 (pembrolizumab and nivolumab) and three to its ligand PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab) have obtained US FDA and EMA approval for the second-line treatment of platinum-pretreated patients, between 2016 and 2019. Atezolizumab and Pembrolizumab are even currently approved in the first-line setting for cisplatin ineligible patients, with PD-L1- positive tumor. The neoadjuvant scenario in localized high-risk disease is still evolving, with the first data available to date limited to the muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. The management of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC: renal pelvis and ureters) is complicated by the lack of specific high-level evidence, due to the rarity of the disease. No published studies addressing immunotherapy in UTUC patients only are available. The largest clinical trials aimed at UC patients, regardless of the upper or lower location of the primary tumor, have enrolled a minority of patients with UTUC, providing the data on which our current knowledge is based. However, targeted scientific efforts are needed to improve our level of care.

conclusionsThis review summarizes the main currently available evidence on the use of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway inhibition with reference to patients presenting with UTUC.

Indexed as

Kidney PelvisCarcinoma, Transitional CellHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsKidney NeoplasmsUreteral NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmunotherapyPD-1PD-L1 inhibitionUpper tract urothelial carcinomaUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33128595
OpenAlexW3094891754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.