Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33128142›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2020

Analyzing and Characterizing Why Men Seek Care for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

Alex Landau, Charles Welliver

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alex LandauDivision of Urology, Albany Medical College, 23 Hackett Blvd, Albany, NY, 12208, USA.
Charles WelliverDivision of Urology, Albany Medical College, 23 Hackett Blvd, Albany, NY, 12208, USA. WellivR@amc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-3218

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe goal of this paper is to summarize existing literature on prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) that may be attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, LUTS/BPH), factors associated with seeking treatment and treatment success, and subjective and objective methods of evaluating LUTS. RECENT

findingsMen primarily seek treatment for LUTS/BPH because bother overcomes barriers to treatment. Factors such as severity, bother, or persistence of symptoms primarily motivate individuals to seek treatment, while low-symptom severity mainly leads individuals to not seek treatment. Among men that seek treatment, nocturia and storage symptoms predominate. LUTS are assessed with self-report questionnaires; subjective evaluations translate moderately well to objective measurements of LUTS severity. Current symptom classifications and patient groupings may be overly simplified and not evidence-based. Further studies evaluating novel symptom clusters and patient-centered BPH treatment approaches can guide future treatment.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareComorbidityHumansLower Urinary Tract SymptomsMalePrevalenceProstatic HyperplasiaSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeBenign prostatic hyperplasiaCare-seeking behaviorLower urinary tract symptoms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.