Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33128137›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

The relationship between nutritional status and prognosis in patients with locally advanced and advanced stage lung cancer.

Busra Gul, Selma Metintas, Guntulu Ak, Senay Yilmaz, Muzaffer Metintas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Busra GulHealth Sciences Institute, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Selma MetintasMedical Faculty, Department of Public Health, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Guntulu AkLung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey. guntuluak@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8849-193X
Senay YilmazMedical Faculty, Department of Chest Diseases, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Muzaffer MetintasLung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Eskişehir Osmangazi University · TROkan University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study aimed to determine the poor nutritional status, related factors, and its effect on the prognosis of patients with locally advanced and advanced stage lung cancer.

methodsThe study consisted of 539 patients, 412 (76.4%) of whom were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and 127 (23.6%) were small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The nutritional status of the patients was evaluated by the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI). Poor nutritional status was diagnosed with the CONUT score of ≥ 2 and PNI of ≥the median value. The factors related to nutritional status were determined using a multivariate logistic regression model. The effect of poor nutritional status on survival was calculated by Cox regression analysis.

resultsThe median age was 64 years (29-87). Poor nutritional status was found in 56.4% (57.8% for NSCLC and 52.0% for SCLC) and 49.2% (51.5% for NSCLC and 41.7% for SCLC) of patients according to CONUT and PNI, respectively. The factors associated with poor nutritional status according to CONUT were age, gender, KPS < 80, and BMI < 18.5 for NSCLC and KPS for SCLC. According to PNI, only KPS < 80 was associated with poor nutritional status by the multivariate logistic regression model. The median overall survival significantly decreased with poor nutritional status according to CONUT and PNI in NSCLC (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and in SCLC (p = 0.05 and p = 0.007, respectively).

conclusionPoor nutritional status is a common factor associated with poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced and advanced stage lung cancer. Patients should be screened for nutritional status and supported.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNutritional StatusPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisAdvanced staged lung cancerCONUTNSCLCNutritional statusPNISCLC

Identifiers

PMID33128137
OpenAlexW3097932042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.