Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33128036›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2021

Meal replacement by formula diet reduces weight more than a lifestyle intervention alone in patients with overweight or obesity and accompanied cardiovascular risk factors-the ACOORH trial.

Martin Halle, Martin Röhling, Winfried Banzer, Klaus Michael Braumann, Kerstin Kempf, David McCarthy, Nina Schaller, Hans Georg Predel, Jürgen Scholze, Dagmar Führer-Sakel and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. [Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (Update 2026)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Obesity and type 2 diabetes (Update 2023)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin Halle *Department of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Martin Röhling *West-German Center of Diabetes and Health, Düsseldorf Catholic Hospital Group, Dusseldorf, Germany. martin.roehling@vkkd-kliniken.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2258-0582
Winfried BanzerDepartment of Sports Medicine, Institute for Sports and Sport Science, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Klaus Michael BraumannFaculty of Psychology and Human Movement Sciences, Department of Sports and Movement Medicine, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Kerstin KempfWest-German Center of Diabetes and Health, Düsseldorf Catholic Hospital Group, Dusseldorf, Germany.
David McCarthyPublic Health Nutrition Research Group, London Metropolitan University, London, UK.
Nina SchallerDepartment of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Hans Georg PredelInstitute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jürgen ScholzeKARDIOS, Cardiologists in Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Dagmar Führer-SakelDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Division of Laboratory Research, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Hermann ToplakDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7513-5167
Aloys BergFaculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
ACOORH study group
German Sport University Cologne · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DELondon Metropolitan University · GBTUM Klinikum · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DEMedical University of Graz · ATUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs formula diets have demonstrated to be effective in reducing weight, we hypothesised that in patients with overweight or obesity and accompanied cardiovascular risk factors, combining a liquid formula diet with a lifestyle intervention is superior in reducing weight and improving cardiovascular risk factors than lifestyle intervention alone.

methodsIn this multicenter RCT 463 participants with overweight or obesity (BMI: 27-35 kg/m²; at least one additional co-morbidity of the metabolic syndrome) were randomised (1:2) into either a control group with lifestyle intervention only (CON, n = 155) or a lifestyle intervention group including a liquid meal replacement (INT, n = 308). Both groups used telemonitoring devices (scales and pedometers), received information on healthy diet and were instructed to increase physical activity. Telemonitoring devices automatically transferred data into a personalised online portal and acquired data were discussed. INT obtained a liquid meal replacement substituting three meals/day (~1200 kcal) within the first week. During weeks 2-4, participants replaced two meals/day and during weeks 5-26 only one meal/day was substituted (1300-1500 kcal/day). Follow-up was conducted after 52 weeks. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. Primary outcome was weight change. Secondary outcomes comprised changes in cardiometabolic risk factors including body composition and laboratory parameters.

resultsFrom the starting cohort 360 (78%, INT: n = 244; CON: n = 116) and 317 (68%, INT: n = 216; CON: n = 101) participants completed the 26-weeks intervention phase and the 52-weeks follow-up. The estimated treatment difference (ETD) between both groups was -3.2 kg [-4.0; -2.5] (P < 0.001) after 12 weeks and -1.8 kg [-2.8; -0.8] (P < 0.001) after 52 weeks.

conclusionsA low-intensity lifestyle intervention combined with a liquid meal replacement is superior regarding weight reduction and improvement of cardiovascular risk factors than lifestyle intervention alone.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDietHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansLife StyleMealsObesityOverweightRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID33128036
OpenAlexW3095447957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.