Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33128028›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2021

Impact of donor type on long-term graft-versus-host disease-free/relapse-free survival for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission.

Jae-Ho Yoon, Gi June Min, Sung-Soo Park, Silvia Park, Sung-Eun Lee, Byung-Sik Cho, Ki-Seong Eom, Yoo-Jin Kim, Hee-Je Kim, Chang-Ki Min and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jae-Ho YoonDepartment of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gi June MinDepartment of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Soo ParkDepartment of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8826-4136
Silvia ParkDepartment of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Eun LeeDepartment of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byung-Sik ChoDepartment of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-6616
Ki-Seong EomDepartment of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yoo-Jin KimDepartment of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hee-Je KimDepartment of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-3366
Chang-Ki MinDepartment of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seok-Goo ChoDepartment of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5429-4839
Jong-Wook LeeDepartment of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seok LeeDepartment of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. leeseok@catholic.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9442-9814
The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed the impact of donor type on long-term outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in 440 consecutive adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1), particularly focusing on the donor type-specific difference in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS). Donor sources were matched sibling donor (MSD; n = 199), matched unrelated donor (MUD; n = 110), 1-allele-mismatched unrelated donor (1-MMUD; n = 83), and cord blood (CB; n = 48). Cumulative incidence of severe chronic GVHD was 14.8% for MSD-HCT, 30.1% for MUD-HCT, 9.6% for 1-MMUD-HCT, and 4.2% for CBT, respectively (P < 0.001), while no difference was observed in grade III-IV acute GVHD. After a median follow-up of 58.1 months, cumulative incidence of relapse was 26.1% for MSD-HCT, 27.2% for MUD-HCT, 31.2% for 1-MMUD-HCT, and 7.2% for CBT, respectively (P = 0.042). Disease-free survival and overall survival were comparable among all donor sources. However, GRFS for MSD-HCT, MUD-HCT, 1-MMUD-HCT, and CBT was 33.1%, 14.5%, 42.1%, and 50.3%, respectively (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, CBT showed a comparable GRFS to MSD-HCT (HR, 0.78; P = 0.290), while MUD-HCT was associated with a poorer GRFS (HR, 1.53; P = 0.002). Given the encouraging GRFS of CBT, our data suggest that CBT remains a valid option for adult ALL in CR1.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAdultHumansRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesUnrelated Donors

Identifiers

PMID33128028
OpenAlexW3096496180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.