Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33127996›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts prognosis in unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Naoto Iwai, Takashi Okuda, Junichi Sakagami, Taishi Harada, Tomoya Ohara, Masashi Taniguchi, Hiroaki Sakai, Kohei Oka, Tasuku Hara, Toshifumi Tsuji and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. P-move: a randomized control trial of exercise in patients with advanced pancreatic or biliary tract cancer (aPBC) receiving beyond first-line chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Naoto IwaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-cho, Fukuchiyama-city, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan. na-iwai@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.
Takashi OkudaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-cho, Fukuchiyama-city, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan.
Junichi SakagamiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-cho, Fukuchiyama-city, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan.
Taishi HaradaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, Fukuchiyama-city, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomoya OharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-cho, Fukuchiyama-city, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan.
Masashi TaniguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-cho, Fukuchiyama-city, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan.
Hiroaki SakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-cho, Fukuchiyama-city, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan.
Kohei OkaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-cho, Fukuchiyama-city, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan.
Tasuku HaraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-cho, Fukuchiyama-city, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan.
Toshifumi TsujiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-cho, Fukuchiyama-city, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan.
Toshiyuki KomakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-cho, Fukuchiyama-city, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan.
Keizo KagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-cho, Fukuchiyama-city, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan.
Hiroaki YasudaDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuji NaitoDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshito ItohDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammation-based prognostic indicators have been developed to predict the prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer. However, prognostic indices have not been established in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, including those without indication for chemotherapy at diagnosis. This study aimed to identify the predictors in all patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. We retrospectively analyzed data of 119 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer from June 2006 to September 2018. The following laboratory parameters were evaluated: the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), modified GPS, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein albumin (CRP/Alb) ratio, and prognostic nutritional index (PNI). We performed time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis, overall survival (OS) analysis, and univariate and multivariate analyses to determine the prognostic factors in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. The cut-off value for NLR was determined to be 3.74. The 6-month OS rates in low and high NLR groups were 75.5% and 18.8% (P < 0.001). In the univariate analysis, advanced age (P = 0.003), metastatic pancreatic cancer (P = 0.037), no treatment (P < 0.001), worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) (P < 0.001), high GPS (P < 0.001), high modified GPS (P < 0.001), high NLR (P < 0.001), high PLR (P = 0.002), high CRP/Alb ratio (P < 0.001), and low PNI (P < 0.001) were identified as the prognostic factors. The multivariate analysis revealed that metastatic pancreatic cancer (P = 0.046), no treatment (P < 0.001), worse ECOG-PS (P = 0.002), and high NLR (P < 0.001) were independently associated with OS. We revealed that the high NLR could be an independent indicator of poor prognosis in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedNeutrophilsPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisBiomarkersC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID33127996
PMCPMC7599218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.