Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33127993›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2021

Lithium modulates striatal reward anticipation and prediction error coding in healthy volunteers.

Inge Volman, Abbie Pringle, Lennart Verhagen, Michael Browning, Phil J Cowen, Catherine J Harmer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Inge VolmanOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK. volman.inge@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3467-1841
Abbie PringleDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lennart VerhagenWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging Neuroimaging (WIN), Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Michael BrowningOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Phil J CowenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5518-6138
Catherine J HarmerOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/K022202/1Medical Research Council MR/N008103/1Medical Research Council MR/S003037/1Wellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust WT100973AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lithium is one of the most effective mood-stabilizing medications in bipolar disorder. This study was designed to test whether lithium administration may stabilize mood via effects on reward processing. It was hypothesized that lithium administration would modulate reward processing in the striatum and affect both anticipation and outcome computations. Thirty-seven healthy human participants (18 males, 33 with suitable fMRI data) received 11 (±1) days of lithium carbonate or placebo intervention (double-blind), after which they completed the monetary incentive delay task while fMRI data were collected. The monetary incentive delay task is a robust task with excellent test-retest reliability and is well suited to investigate different phases of reward processing within the caudate and nucleus accumbens. To test for correlations with prediction error signals a Rescorla-Wagner reinforcement-learning model was applied. Lithium administration enhanced activity in the caudate during reward anticipation compared to placebo. In contrast, lithium administration reduced caudate and nucleus accumbens activity during reward outcome. This latter effect seems related to learning as reward prediction errors showed a positive correlation with caudate and nucleus accumbens activity during placebo, which was absent after lithium administration. Lithium differentially modulates the anticipation relative to the learning of rewards. This suggests that lithium might reverse dampened reward anticipation while reducing overactive reward updating in patients with bipolar disorder. This specific effect of lithium suggests that a targeted modulation of reward learning may be a viable approach for novel interventions in bipolar disorder.

Indexed as

LithiumRewardAnticipation, PsychologicalDouble-Blind MethodHealthy VolunteersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotivationReproducibility of ResultsLithium

Identifiers

PMID33127993
PMCPMC7853118
OpenAlexW3093680960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.