Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33127967›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

Preoperative communication with anesthetists via anesthesia service platform (ASP) helps alleviate patients' preoperative anxiety.

Fei Peng, Tao Peng, Qiange Yang, Meihan Liu, Guangxiang Chen, Maohua Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. The Shouldice Method: an expert's consensus.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fei PengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Tao PengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Qiange YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Meihan LiuSouthwest Medical University, Luzhou, People's Republic of China.
Guangxiang ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Maohua WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. wangmaohua@swmu.edu.cn.
Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNSouthwest Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female gender has been identified as one of the risk factors closely linked to perioperative anxiety and a lower level of satisfaction. A successful preoperative anesthesia education may improve such negative outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether preoperative anesthesia education via an Anesthesia Service Platform (ASP) could reduce the anxiety levels in female patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia, and accelerate rehabilitation. A total of 222 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to the control group and the ASP group. Patients' baseline and post-intervention psychological status was measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and General Well-Being Schedule. Pain management and recovery were assessed by VAS every 12 h for 48 h after surgery; length of stay (LOS) and postoperative analgesic consumption were also assessed. Patients in the control group experienced higher anxiety levels before surgery and had longer LOS than those in the ASP group. Patients in the ASP group had a higher general well-being score; however, they suffered more pain and consumed more analgesics after surgery. ASP is effective for preventing anxiety in female patients before laparoscopic cholecystectomy, improving patients' general well-being levels, and shortening their LOS, but negatively influences patients' postoperative pain levels.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologistsPatient Education as TopicPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAnalgesiaAnesthesiaAnesthesia, GeneralAnxietyCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPain Management

Identifiers

PMID33127967
PMCPMC7603311
OpenAlexW3095167527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.