Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33127830›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of ophthalmology2022

Aflibercept for age-related macular degeneration: 4-year outcomes of a 'treat-and-extend' regimen with exit-strategy.

Damian Jaggi, Thanoosha Nagamany, Andreas Ebneter, Marion Munk, Sebastian Wolf, Martin Zinkernagel

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Long-term remission and incidence of recurrence of neovascularization in intravitreal injection treated exudative age-related macular degeneration.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Two-year outcomes of intravitreal brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: treat, extend, and stop-protocol.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Damian JaggiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hostpital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Thanoosha NagamanyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hostpital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Andreas EbneterDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hostpital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marion MunkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hostpital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sebastian WolfDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hostpital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Martin ZinkernagelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hostpital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland Martin.zinkernagel@insel.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-3447-2359

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo report long-term outcomes on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and treatment intervals with a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

methodsThis observational study included treatment-naïve patients with nAMD, treated with aflibercept. A specific T&E protocol without a loading phase and predefined exit criteria was administered. After reaching predefined 'exit-criteria', the treatment period was complete, and patients were observed three monthly.

resultsEighty-two patients with a follow-up period of ≥2 years were included. BCVA (mean±SD, ETDRS letters) increased from 51.9±25.2 at baseline to 63.7±17.7 (p<0.0001) at 1 year, 61.7±18.5 (p<0.0001) at 2 years, 62.4±19.5 (p<0.0001, n=61) at 3 years and remained insignificantly higher than baseline at 4 years at 58.5±24.3 (p=0.22). Central subfield thickness (mean±SD, μm) decreased significantly from 387.5±107.6 (p<0.0001) at baseline to 291.9±65.5 (p<0.0001) at 1 year, and remained significantly lower until 4 years at 289.0±59.4 (p<0.0001). Treatment intervals (mean±SD, weeks) could be extended up to 9.3±3.1 weeks at 1 year and remained at 11.2±3.5 weeks at 4 years. Twenty-nine (35%) patients reached exit criteria and continued with three monthly observation only.

conclusionsAfter 4 years of treatment, initial vision gains were maintained with a reasonable treatment burden, even without an initial loading phase. Our results on functional outcomes are comparable with large controlled studies.

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationWet Macular DegenerationAngiogenesis InhibitorsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsNeovascularisationRetinaVitreous

Identifiers

PMID33127830
PMCPMC8788035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.