Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33127759›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Dissecting heterogeneous cell populations across drug and disease conditions with PopAlign.

Sisi Chen, Paul Rivaud, Jong H Park, Tiffany Tsou, Emeric Charles, John R Haliburton, Flavia Pichiorri, Matt Thomson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Computational modeling of single-cell dynamics data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stochastic Modeling of Biophysical Responses to Perturbation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The specious art of single-cell genomics.PLoS computational biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sisi ChenDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; mthomson@caltech.edu sisi.chen1@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9448-9713
Paul RivaudDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.ORCID 0000-0001-8637-3331
Jong H ParkDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Tiffany TsouDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.ORCID 0000-0002-5651-2879
Emeric CharlesDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720.
John R HaliburtonAugmenta Bioworks Inc., Menlo Park, CA 94025.
Flavia PichiorriDepartment of Hematologic Malignancies Translational Science, City of Hope, Monrovia, CA 91016.
Matt ThomsonDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; mthomson@caltech.edu sisi.chen1@gmail.com.
California Institute of Technology · USBioWorks (United States) · USCity of Hope · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

System dynamics and gene network architecture of early T-cell developmentR01HD100039 · NICHD · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ELLEN V. ROTHENBERG · 2019 to 2026
$4.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD100039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell measurement techniques can now probe gene expression in heterogeneous cell populations from the human body across a range of environmental and physiological conditions. However, new mathematical and computational methods are required to represent and analyze gene-expression changes that occur in complex mixtures of single cells as they respond to signals, drugs, or disease states. Here, we introduce a mathematical modeling platform, PopAlign, that automatically identifies subpopulations of cells within a heterogeneous mixture and tracks gene-expression and cell-abundance changes across subpopulations by constructing and comparing probabilistic models. Probabilistic models provide a low-error, compressed representation of single-cell data that enables efficient large-scale computations. We apply PopAlign to analyze the impact of 40 different immunomodulatory compounds on a heterogeneous population of donor-derived human immune cells as well as patient-specific disease signatures in multiple myeloma. PopAlign scales to comparisons involving tens to hundreds of samples, enabling large-scale studies of natural and engineered cell populations as they respond to drugs, signals, or physiological change.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingHumansModels, StatisticalModels, TheoreticalSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Analysisprobabilistic modelssingle-cell genomicssingle cell mRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID33127759
PMCPMC7682438
OpenAlexW3096333621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.