Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33127652›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2021

Phase I Clinical Trial of Combination Propranolol and Pembrolizumab in Locally Advanced and Metastatic Melanoma: Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Evidence of Antitumor Activity.

Shipra Gandhi, Manu R Pandey, Kristopher Attwood, Wenyan Ji, Agnieszka K Witkiewicz, Erik S Knudsen, Cheryl Allen, Joseph D Tario, Paul K Wallace, Carlos D Cedeno and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shipra Gandhi *Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York. shipra.gandhi@roswellpark.org.
Manu R Pandey *Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Kristopher AttwoodDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Wenyan JiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Agnieszka K WitkiewiczCenter for Personalized Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Erik S KnudsenCenter for Personalized Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-5130-5969
Cheryl AllenDepartment of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Joseph D TarioDepartment of Flow Cytometry, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Paul K WallaceDepartment of Flow Cytometry, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Carlos D CedenoDepartment of Flow Cytometry, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Maria LevisClinical Research Service, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Suzanne StackClinical Research Service, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-4256-8035
Pauline FunchainDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Joseph J DrabickDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Mark J BucsekDepartment of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Igor PuzanovDepartment of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Hemn MohammadpourDepartment of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Elizabeth A Repasky *Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Marc S Ernstoff *Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USCleveland Clinic · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · US

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI CANDACE S JOHNSON · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
University of Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute - Supplement SchulyerUL1TR001412 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MURPHY, TIMOTHY F · 2015 to 2024
$33.8M
Institutional Career DevelopmentKL2TR001413 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI DUBOCOVICH, MARGARITA L · 2015 to 2024
$4.2M
Understanding how adrenergic signaling influences immune contexture of tumors and the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitorsR01CA205246 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI REPASKY, ELIZABETH A · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001413NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001412NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS R01 CA205246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIncreased β-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) signaling has been shown to promote the creation of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Preclinical studies have shown that abrogation of this signaling pathway, particularly β2-AR, provides a more favorable TME that enhances the activity of anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors. We hypothesize that blocking stress-related immunosuppressive pathways would improve tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients. Here, we report the results of dose escalation of a nonselective β-blocker (propranolol) with pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND

methodsA 3 + 3 dose escalation study for propranolol twice a day with pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) was completed. The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Additional objectives included safety, antitumor activity, and biomarker analyses. Responders were defined as patients with complete or partial response per immune-modified RECIST at 6 months.

resultsNine patients with metastatic melanoma received increasing doses of propranolol in cohorts of 10, 20, and 30 mg twice a day. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were rash, fatigue, and vitiligo, observed in 44% patients. One patient developed two grade ≥3 TRAEs. Objective response rate was 78%. While no significant changes in treatment-associated biomarkers were observed, an increase in IFNγ and a decrease in IL6 was noted in responders.

conclusionsCombination of propranolol with pembrolizumab in treatment-naïve metastatic melanoma is safe and shows very promising activity. Propranolol 30 mg twice a day was selected as RP2D in addition to pembrolizumab based on safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPropranololResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsSkin NeoplasmsTumor EscapeTumor MicroenvironmentAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedpembrolizumabPropranolol

Identifiers

PMID33127652
PMCPMC7785669
OpenAlexW3095647733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.