Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33126920›Full record

ArticleBiology of sex differences2020

Is sex a proxy for mechanical variables during an upper limb repetitive movement task? An investigation of the effects of sex and of anthropometric load on muscle fatigue.

Matthew Slopecki, Karen Messing, Julie N Côté

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sex differences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Saturation of muscle and peripheral oxygen, blood pressure, and perceived exertion in individuals exposed to repetitive muscle work.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew SlopeckiDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, 475 Pine Ave W, Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1S4, Canada. matthew.slopecki@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-7134-6023
Karen MessingCINBIOSE Research Centre, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), 8888, Succ. Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3P8, Canada.
Julie N CôtéDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, 475 Pine Ave W, Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1S4, Canada.
McGill University · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CA

Funding

Canada Foundation for Innovation 10131CIHR 153464Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2015-05111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen report more work-related pain and neck/shoulder musculoskeletal disorders than men. For the same absolute workload, due to lower strength, females generally work at a higher relative intensity, which could induce more fatigue. However, the arm's anthropometric load (AL) of men is higher. Therefore, simply lifting their arm could be more fatiguing. Sex as a variable is formed of many constructs, and analyses can become muddied by their differing responses to fatigue. No studies have considered AL, when comparing how fatigue affects men and women. The purpose was to determine if including the arm's AL in the statistical analysis would impact findings of sex-specific effects of shoulder fatigue on muscle EMG.

methodsFifty-five (29m/26f) participants completed a repetitive pointing task (RPT) at shoulder height until they reported fatigue of 8+ on the BORG CR-10 scale. Muscle activities were measured using surface electrodes placed over the anterior deltoid (AD) and upper trapezius (UT) muscles. Muscle activity amplitude was quantified using root mean square (RMS). First- and last-minute data were used to assess change from no-fatigue (NF) to fatigue-terminal (FT) conditions. AL was calculated using sex-specific body parameter equations. General estimating equations (GEE) were used to determine the effects of sex and fatigue on RMS values, while including AL in the GEE.

resultsThere was no sex difference in time to reach fatigue. A significant main effect of sex on RMS was observed (χ

conclusionsThis sex difference emerged when AL was included as a covariate, suggesting that sex-associated anthropometric differences may contribute to sex differences in the fatigue response. Differences in the impact of AL on AD compared to UT could be explained by differences in their respective mechanical roles or muscle fiber content. Anthropometrics may be useful to include as covariates in future research to separate individual anthropometric differences from sex differences.

Indexed as

AdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMuscle FatigueSex FactorsUpper ExtremityYoung AdultAnthropometricsFatigueMusculoskeletal disordersNeck/shoulderRepetitive workSex differencesShoulderUpper limb

Identifiers

PMID33126920
PMCPMC7596960
OpenAlexW3096130019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.