Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33126913›Full record

ReviewParasites & vectors2020

Review on the molecular study of the Diplozoidae: analyses of currently available genetic data, what it tells us, and where to go from here.

Quinton Marco Dos Santos, Annemariè Avenant-Oldewage

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A new species ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Review
  2. Parasitology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Identification ofZooKeys · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Quinton Marco Dos SantosDepartment of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, P.O. Box 524, Johannesburg, 2006, South Africa.
Annemariè Avenant-OldewageDepartment of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, P.O. Box 524, Johannesburg, 2006, South Africa. aoldewage@uj.ac.za.

Funding

National Research Foundation (ZA) 115343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of molecular tools in the study of parasite taxonomy and systematics have become a substantial and crucial component of parasitology. Having genetic characterisation at the disposal of researchers has produced mostly useful, and arguably more objective conclusions. However, there are several groups for which limited genetic information is available and, coupled with the lack of standardised protocols, renders molecular study of these groups challenging. The Diplozoidae are fascinating and unique monogeneans parasitizing mainly freshwater cyprinid fishes in Europe, Asia and Africa. This group was studied from a molecular aspect since the turn of the century and as such, limitations and variability concerning the use of these techniques have not been clearly defined. In this review, all literature and molecular information, primarily from online databases such as GenBank, were compiled and scrupulously analysed for the Diplozoidae. This was done to review the information, detect possible pitfalls, and provide a "checkpoint" for future molecular studies of the family. Hindrances detected are the availability of sequence data for only a limited number of species, frequently limited to a single sequence per species, and the heavy reliance on one non-coding ribosomal marker (ITS2 rDNA) which is difficult to align objectively and displays massive divergences between taxa. Challenging species identification and limited understanding of diplozoid species diversity and plasticity are also likely restricting factors, all of which hamper the accurate taxonomic and phylogenetic study of this group. Thus, a more integrated taxonomic approach through the inclusion of additional markers, application of more rigorous morphological assessment, more structured barcoding techniques, alongside thorough capturing of species descriptions including genetypes, genophore vouchers and reference collections in open sources are encouraged. The pitfalls highlighted are not singular to the Diplozoidae, and the study of other groups may benefit from the points raised here as well.

Indexed as

AfricaAnimalsAsiaCyprinidaeDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerEuropeFresh WaterPhylogenyTrematodaDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerAfrodiplozoonDiplozoonEudiplozoonFish parasitesGenetic characterisationInustiatusMolecular taxonomyMonogeneaParadiplozoonSindiplozoon

Identifiers

PMID33126913
PMCPMC7602351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.