Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33126891›Full record

ReviewJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition2020

Reviewing the current methods of assessing hydration in athletes.

Oliver R Barley, Dale W Chapman, Chris R Abbiss

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05380089 (Effects of Hydration Changes on Neuromuscular Function of Athletes With Low Water Intake), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05380089 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Hydration Changes on Neuromuscular Function of Athletes With Low Water Intake

TypeinterventionalSponsorFaculdade de Motricidade HumanaRan2021 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsDehydration, HyperhydrationArmsIncreasing water intake
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Understanding Impact of Anti-Obesity Medications on Skeletal Muscle Mass Change Is Confounded by Measurement Methods.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Dissemination of Heat Safety Practices Among Florida Farmworker Crews.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Wireless arm-worn bioimpedance sensor for continuous assessment of whole-body hydration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oliver R BarleyCentre for Exercise and Sports Science Research, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia. o.barley@ecu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8543-9818
Dale W ChapmanCentre for Exercise and Sports Science Research, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.
Chris R AbbissCentre for Exercise and Sports Science Research, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.
Edith Cowan University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a substantial body of research, no clear best practice guidelines exist for the assessment of hydration in athletes. Body water is stored in and shifted between different sites throughout the body complicating hydration assessment. This review seeks to highlight the unique strengths and limitations of various hydration assessment methods described in the literature as well as providing best practice guidelines. MAIN BODY: There is a plethora of methods that range in validity and reliability, including complicated and invasive methods (i.e. neutron activation analysis and stable isotope dilution), to moderately invasive blood, urine and salivary variables, progressing to non-invasive metrics such as tear osmolality, body mass, bioimpedance analysis, and sensation of thirst. Any single assessment of hydration status is problematic. Instead, the recommended approach is to use a combination, which have complementary strengths, which increase accuracy and validity. If methods such as salivary variables, urine colour, vital signs and sensation of thirst are utilised in isolation, great care must be taken due to their lack of sensitivity, reliability and/or accuracy. Detailed assessments such as neutron activation and stable isotope dilution analysis are highly accurate but expensive, with significant time delays due to data analysis providing little potential for immediate action. While alternative variables such as hormonal and electrolyte concentration, bioimpedance and tear osmolality require further research to determine their validity and reliability before inclusion into any test battery.

conclusionTo improve best practice additional comprehensive research is required to further the scientific understanding of evaluating hydration status.

Indexed as

DrinkingAbsorptiometry, PhotonBlood Physiological PhenomenaBody Mass IndexBody WaterDehydrationElectric ImpedanceHematocritHormonesHumansNeutron Activation AnalysisOsmolar ConcentrationSalivaSerumSodiumSportsHormonesSodiumDehydrationFluidHydrationHypohydrationWater balance

Identifiers

PMID33126891
PMCPMC7602338
OpenAlexW3096650230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.