Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33126770›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Cell Communications among Microorganisms, Plants, and Animals: Origin, Evolution, and Interplays.

Yves Combarnous, Thi Mong Diep Nguyen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Chemical Conversations.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Exosomes: Methods for Isolation and Characterization in Biological Samples.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  13. ROS are evolutionary conserved cell-to-cell stress signals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Soil Fungal Community Structure and Its Effect on COInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  17. Small Cellular Particles from European Spruce Needle Homogenate.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yves CombarnousPhysiologie de la Reproduction & des Comportements Laboratory, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique & Environnementale (INRAe), University of Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0574-2025
Thi Mong Diep NguyenFaculty of Natural Sciences, Quy Nhon University, Quy Nhon City 55000, Binh Dinh, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-6534-9041

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular communications play pivotal roles in multi-cellular species, but they do so also in uni-cellular species. Moreover, cells communicate with each other not only within the same individual, but also with cells in other individuals belonging to the same or other species. These communications occur between two unicellular species, two multicellular species, or between unicellular and multicellular species. The molecular mechanisms involved exhibit diversity and specificity, but they share common basic features, which allow common pathways of communication between different species, often phylogenetically very distant. These interactions are possible by the high degree of conservation of the basic molecular mechanisms of interaction of many ligand-receptor pairs in evolutionary remote species. These inter-species cellular communications played crucial roles during Evolution and must have been positively selected, particularly when collectively beneficial in hostile environments. It is likely that communications between cells did not arise after their emergence, but were part of the very nature of the first cells. Synchronization of populations of non-living protocells through chemical communications may have been a mandatory step towards their emergence as populations of living cells and explain the large commonality of cell communication mechanisms among microorganisms, plants, and animals.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCell CommunicationAnimalsBacteriaFungiPhylogenyPlantsVirusesbacteriaevolutionfungihormonemetazoamicrobiotaorigin of lifeplantsquorum sensingreceptor

Identifiers

PMID33126770
PMCPMC7663094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.