Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33126714›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Dental Diagnosis and Treatment Assessments: Between X-rays Radiography and Optical Coherence Tomography.

Ralph-Alexandru Erdelyi, Virgil-Florin Duma, Cosmin Sinescu, George Mihai Dobre, Adrian Bradu, Adrian Podoleanu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Use of Optical Coherence Tomography in Dentistry.International journal of dentistry · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ralph-Alexandru ErdelyiDoctoral School, Polytechnic University of Timisoara, 1 Mihai Viteazu Ave., 300222 Timisoara, Romania.
Virgil-Florin Duma3OM Optomechatronics Group, "Aurel Vlaicu" University of Arad, 77 Revolutiei Ave., 310130 Arad, Romania.
Cosmin SinescuResearch Center in Dental Medicine Using Conventional and Alternative Technologies, School of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 9 Revolutiei 1989 Ave., 300070 Timisoara, Romania.
George Mihai DobreApplied Optics Group, School of Physics, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NR, UK.
Adrian BraduApplied Optics Group, School of Physics, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NR, UK.
Adrian PodoleanuApplied Optics Group, School of Physics, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NR, UK.
University of Kent · GBPolytechnic University of Timişoara · ROVictor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · RO

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S0166431/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Rebot EP/N019229/1European Regional Development Fund BioCell-NanoART Grant POC-A1-A1.1.4-E nr. 30/2016European Research Council Grant 249889Ministerul Educaţiei Naţionale CNDI-UEFISCDI grant PN-III-P2-2.1-PTE-2016-0181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A correct diagnosis in dental medicine is typically provided only after clinical and radiological evaluations. They are also required for treatment assessments. The aim of this study is to establish the boundaries from which a modern, although established, imaging technique, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), is more suitable than the common X-ray radiography to assess dental issues and treatments. The most common methods for daily-basis clinical imaging are utilized in this study for extracted teeth (but also for other dental samples and materials), i.e., panoramic, intraoral radiography, and three-dimensional (3D) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The advantages of using OCT as an imaging method in dentistry are discussed, with a focus on its superior image resolution. Drawbacks related to its limited penetration depth and Field-of-View (FOV) are pointed out. High-quality radiological investigations are performed, measurements are done, and data collected. The same teeth and samples are also imaged (mostly) with an in-house developed Swept Source (SS)-OCT system, Master-Slave enhanced. Some of the OCT investigations employed two other in-house developed OCT systems, Spectral Domain (SD) and Time Domain (TD). Dedicated toolbars from Romexis software (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) are used to perform measurements using both radiography and OCT. Clinical conclusions are drawn from the investigations. Upsides and downsides of the two medical imaging techniques are concluded for each type of considered diagnosis. For treatment assessments, it is concluded that OCT is more appropriate than radiography in all applications, except bone-related investigations and periodontitis that demand data from higher-penetration depths than possible with the current level of OCT technology.

Indexed as

biocompatible materialsbiomedical imagingCone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)dental cavitiesdental medicineOptical Coherence Tomography (OCT)optical measurementsquantitative assessmentsX-ray radiography

Identifiers

PMID33126714
PMCPMC7662893
OpenAlexW3095545894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.