Subjective Environmental Experiences and Women's Breastfeeding Journeys: A Survival Analysis Using an Online Survey of UK Mothers.

Laura J Brown, Sarah Myers, Abigail E Page, Emily H Emmott

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Testing the buffering hypothesis: Breastfeeding problems, cessation, and social support in the UK.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura J BrownDepartment of International Development, London School of Economics & Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0717-5105

Sarah MyersUCL Anthropology, University College London, London WC1H 0BW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0542-7540

Abigail E PageDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0973-1569

Emily H EmmottUCL Anthropology, University College London, London WC1H 0BW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4862-179X

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P014216/1

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local physical and social environmental factors are important drivers of human health and behaviour. Environmental perception has been linked with both reproduction and parenting, but links between subjective environmental experiences and breastfeeding remain unclear. Using retrospective data from an online survey of UK mothers of children aged 0-24 months, Cox-Aalen survival models test whether negative subjective environmental experiences negatively correlated with any and exclusive breastfeeding (max

Indexed as

Breast FeedingEnvironmentMothersResidence CharacteristicsAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdombreastfeedingcrimelitteringphysical environmentsocial environmentsocial supportsubjective environmental experiencesUK

Identifiers

PMID33126713

DOI10.3390/ijerph17217903

PMCPMC7662350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.