Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33126670›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Validation of the Equine Behaviour Assessment and Research Questionnaire (E-BARQ): A New Survey Instrument for Exploring and Monitoring the Domestic Equine Triad.

Kate Fenner, Sarah Matlock, Jane Williams, Bethany Wilson, Andrew McLean, James Serpell, Paul McGreevy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. No More Evasion: Redefining Conflict Behaviour in Human-Horse Interactions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Limitations of Spatial Judgment Bias Test Application in Horses (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kate FennerSydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0649-3278
Sarah MatlockEquine Sciences Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Jane WilliamsEquine Department, Hartpury University, Gloucester GL19 3BE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0695-3828
Bethany WilsonSydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.
Andrew McLeanEquitation Science International, 3 Wonderland Ave, Tuerong, VIC 3915, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6971-7961
James SerpellSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Paul McGreevySydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7220-8378
The University of Sydney · AUColorado State University · USHartpury University · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Equine Behaviour Assessment and Research Questionnaire (E-BARQ) was developed to obtain quantitative data on the domestic equine triad: training, management and behaviour. It can be taken repeatedly, thus collecting longitudinal data to enable evaluation of how changes in a horse's training and management are reflected in that horse's behaviour over time and how these changes can impact horse welfare in the longer term. Questionnaire validation and reliability were tested by determining (a) whether an owner's subjective ratings of their horse's problematic behaviours or undesirable temperament traits were reflected in the questionnaire scores obtained for that horse (construct validity), (b) whether two respondents, equally familiar with a particular horse, reported comparable scores for that horse through the questionnaire (inter-rater reliability), and (c) whether the same respondent, scoring the same horse after a known interval of time, recorded similar responses (intra-rater reliability). Construct validity testing of 1923 responses showed significant alignment between owners' reported experience of focal horses' behaviour and those horses' E-BARQ scores, with scores varying from 1.13 to 1.34 for ridden horse behaviour (all

Indexed as

behaviour assessmentdomestic equine triadethical equitationhorse behaviourhorse welfarerider safety

Identifiers

PMID33126670
PMCPMC7692587
OpenAlexW3096051966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.