Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33126341›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Efficacy of infliximab, cyclosporine and tacrolimus on ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis.

Xuemei Jia, Ruitong Guo, Zhenbiao Hu, Jianxin Liu, Jianping Liu, Bolin Li, Qian Yang, Jianming He

Open access · goldAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Xuemei JiaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hebei Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang.
Ruitong GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hebei Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang.
Zhenbiao HuCollege of Electronic Countermeasure, National University of Defense Technology.
Jianxin LiuCollege of Electronic Countermeasure, National University of Defense Technology.
Jianping LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hebei Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang.
Bolin LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hebei Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang.
Qian YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hebei Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang.
Jianming HeDepartment of Radiotherapy, Hebei Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1163-8336
Apple (Israel) · ILHebei University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPositioning infliximab (IFX), cyclosporine and tacrolimus (TAC) for treating ulcerative colitis (UC) is in great debate.

methodsA literature search identified studies that investigated IFX vs. cyclosporine or IFX vs TAC in UC patients. Short-term remission, short-term, 1-year and 3-year colectomy rate were employed as primary end-points to assess efficacy. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were analyzed.

resultsOverall, 15 studies comprised 596 patients in IFX group and 866 in calcineurin inhibitors group (644 received cyclosporine and 222 received TAC). No significant difference was seen between IFX and calcineurin inhibitors with regard to short-term remission. IFX led to a lower short-term (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.43-0.82, P:.001), 1-year (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.38-0.73, P < .001), 3-year colectomy (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.20-0.84, P:.02) than calcineurin inhibitors. IFX led to a lower short-term (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36-0.71, P < .001), 1-year (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.37-0.74, P:.003) colectomy and a trend of lower 3-year colectomy (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.22-1.06, P:.07) than cyclosporine while no significant difference was seen between IFX and TAC. Results of network meta-analysis showed that the order was cyclosporine, TAC and IFX from high rate to low with regard to short-term and 1-year colectomy.

conclusionIFX treatment leads to a lower short-term, 1-year colectomy rate and a trend of lower 3-year colectomy rate in UC patients than cyclosporine while no significant difference is seen between IFX and TAC. TAC may be superior than cyclosporine with regard to efficacy based on indirect comparisons. Randomized trials with fixed protocol are warranted to identify the optimal medical strategy in patients with UC.

Indexed as

ColectomyColitis, UlcerativeCyclosporineHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInfliximabRemission InductionTacrolimusTreatment OutcomeCyclosporineImmunosuppressive AgentsInfliximabTacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID33126341
PMCPMC7598782
OpenAlexW3097089218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.