SynthesisMedicine2020
Receptor for advanced glycation end-product rs1800624 polymorphism contributes to increase breast cancer risk: Evidence from a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- An overview on glycation: molecular mechanisms, impact on proteins, pathogenesis, and inhibition.Biophysical reviews · 2024Review
- RAGE and its ligands in breast cancer progression and metastasis.Oncology reviews · 2024Review
- Are dietary and serum advanced glycation end-products related to inflammation and oxidation biomarkers in breast cancer patients: a follow-up study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- The impact of receptor of advanced glycation end-products polymorphisms on prostate cancer progression and clinicopathological characteristics.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021Article
- Toxicity of advanced glycation end products (Review).Biomedical reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough several studies have identified an association between the receptor for advanced glycation end-product (RAGE) rs1800624 polymorphism and breast cancer, the results have been conflicting. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between the RAGE rs1800624 polymorphism and breast cancer risk.
methodsStudies were searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Wanfang Med Online, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases until September 20, 2019 to identify all potential literature on this association. Fixed-effect or random-effect models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses and tests for publication bias were also performed.
resultsFive eligible studies involving 2823 subjects (1410 patients and 1413 healthy controls) were included in the current meta-analysis. The pooled analysis indicated a positive correlation between the RAGE rs1800624 polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer in a homozygous genetic model (OR = 1.423, 95% CI = 1.043-1.941, P = .026). Ethnicity-based subgroup analysis demonstrated that RAGE rs1800624 polymorphism may increase the risk of breast cancer in the Asian population in homozygous model (OR = 1.661, 95% CI = 1.178-2.342, P = .004).
conclusionThe RAGE rs1800624 polymorphism may increase the risk of breast cancer in the homozygous genetic model, especially in Asian populations. Large-scale and well-designed studies are needed in different populations to further evaluate the role of the RAGE polymorphism in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.