ArticleJAMA oncology2021
Comparison of Universal Genetic Testing vs Guideline-Directed Targeted Testing for Patients With Hereditary Cancer Syndrome.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06436157 (Genetic Testing Uptake Through an Enhanced Oncology Nurse-Led Intervention in Patients With Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 178 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Genetic Testing Uptake Through an Enhanced Oncology Nurse-Led Intervention in Patients With Solid Tumors (GENESIS): A Pilot Study
Who cites it
178 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 284 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence-based advancements in breast cancer genetic counseling: a review.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Pooled it
- [Pregnancy-preserving and maternal-fetal management in a patient with rare large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2021Pooled it
- Video Education Is an Acceptable Alternative to Pretest Genetic Counseling for Patients With Breast, Ovarian, Pancreatic, and Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Results From a Randomized Study.JCO oncology practice · 2025Trial
- Universal versus Guideline-Directed Germline Testing in Breast Cancer: Incremental Diagnostic Yield in a Predominantly Black Population.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Germline pathogenic variants in Japanese adolescents and young adults with advanced solid tumors: a nationwide tumor-normal paired sequencing study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Observational
- [Genetic diagnostics].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Results of a multigene panel testing approach targeting patients with suspected genetic predisposition to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Sequencing approaches in hereditary cancer testing: strengths, limitations and future directions.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- The evolution of hereditary cancer genetic counselling: mainstreaming, service redesign and patient experience in Lynch syndrome.Familial cancer · 2026Review
- Structure-Based Network Analysis of AlphaFold Structure Predictions Identifies Putative Causative Variants of Inherited Retinal Disease.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- BRCA1 c.68_69del as a founder variant in the Spanish Roma: prevalence and screening implications.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Epidemiology of Childhood Cancer and Cancer Predisposition Syndromes (CPSs): A 20-Year Single-Center Cohort from the Greater Poland Region.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical Performance of International and Korean Genetic Testing Criteria for Hereditary Breast Cancer: A Large-Scale Cohort Analysis of 2,188 Individuals.Journal of breast cancer · 2026Article
- Differences in Cascade Genetic Testing Among Families With Hereditary Cancer Risk.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Germline Genetic Testing in Breast and Gynecologic Cancers: Evaluating Age at Diagnosis as a Determinant.Cancers · 2026Article
- Multigene Germline Testing in Patients with DCIS vs Invasive Breast Cancer in a Large, Integrated Health Care System.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- A paradigm shift in genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer: the impact of germline multigene panel testing on diagnosis and management.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- A scalable new model of germline cancer genomic care delivery: Assessing psychological outcomes.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026Article
- Primary care stakeholder perspectives on clinical implementation of patient-reported hereditary cancer risk-assessment.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Universal Germline Genetic Testing in a Precision Oncology and Rare Cancer Clinic: Implementation and Outcomes.JCO oncology advances · 2026Article
118 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
28 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceHereditary factors play a key role in the risk of developing several cancers. Identification of a germline predisposition can have important implications for treatment decisions, risk-reducing interventions, cancer screening, and germline testing.
objectiveTo examine the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in patients with cancer using a universal testing approach compared with targeted testing based on clinical guidelines and the uptake of cascade family variant testing (FVT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis prospective, multicenter cohort study assessed germline genetic alterations among patients with solid tumor cancer receiving care at Mayo Clinic cancer centers and a community practice between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020. Patients were not selected based on cancer type, disease stage, family history of cancer, ethnicity, or age. EXPOSURES: Germline sequencing using a greater than 80-gene next-generation sequencing platform. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Proportion of PGVs detected with a universal strategy compared with a guideline-directed approach and uptake of cascade FVT in families.
resultsA total of 2984 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.4 [12.2] years; 1582 [53.0%] male) were studied. Pathogenic germline variants were found in 397 patients (13.3%), including 282 moderate- and high-penetrance cancer susceptibility genes. Variants of uncertain significance were found in 1415 patients (47.4%). A total of 192 patients (6.4%) had incremental clinically actionable findings that would not have been detected by phenotype or family history-based testing criteria. Of those with a high-penetrance PGV, 42 patients (28.2%) had modifications in their treatment based on the finding. Only younger age of diagnosis was associated with presence of PGV. Only 70 patients (17.6%) with PGVs had family members undergoing no-cost cascade FVT. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This prospective, multicenter cohort study found that universal multigene panel testing among patients with solid tumor cancer was associated with an increased detection of heritable variants over the predicted yield of targeted testing based on guidelines. Nearly 30% of patients with high-penetrance variants had modifications in their treatment. Uptake of cascade FVT was low despite being offered at no cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.