ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2021
Nickel-Titanium peripheral stents: Which is the best criterion for the multi-axial fatigue strength assessment?
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relevant Choices Affecting the Fatigue Analysis of Ni-Ti Endovascular Devices.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Reliable Numerical Models of Nickel-Titanium Stents: How to Deduce the Specific Material Properties from Testing Real Devices.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ni-Ti stents fatigue strength assessment requires a multi-factorial complex integration of applied loads, material and design and is of increasing interest. In this work, a coupled experimental-numerical method for the multi-axial fatigue strength assessment is proposed and verified for two different stent geometries that resemble commercial products. Particular attention was paid to the identification of the material fatigue limit curve. The common approach for the Ni-Ti stents fatigue assessment based on the von Mises yield criterion was proven unsuitable for a realistic fatigue strength assessment. On the other hand, critical plane-based criteria were more representative of the experimental outcomes regardless of stent design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.