Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33125868›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2021

Divergent Strategies for Learning in Males and Females.

Cathy S Chen, R Becket Ebitz, Sylvia R Bindas, A David Redish, Benjamin Y Hayden, Nicola M Grissom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sex-biased computations underlying differential set shift performance in mice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Premature release of action sequences in adolescent male rats.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Individual differences in sequential decision-making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cathy S ChenDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 E River Rd, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
R Becket EbitzDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, 321 Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Sylvia R BindasDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 E River Rd, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
A David RedishDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, 321 Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Benjamin Y HaydenDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, 321 Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Nicola M GrissomDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 E River Rd, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Electronic address: ngrissom@umn.edu.

Funding

Using a computational and network neuroscience framework to study pharmacological manipulations of state representation processes in early psychosisP50MH119569 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI A DAVID REDISH, Sophia Vinogradov · 2020 to 2026
$24.5M
Sex-biased impacts of 16p11.2 variants on reward-guided choiceR01MH123661 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GRISSOM, NICOLA · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
Using Computation to Achieve Breakthroughs in NeuroscienceT32MH115886 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH119569NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123661NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH115886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A frequent assumption in value-based decision-making tasks is that agents make decisions based on the feature dimension that reward probabilities vary on. However, in complex, multidimensional environments, stimuli can vary on multiple dimensions at once, meaning that the feature deserving the most credit for outcomes is not always obvious. As a result, individuals may vary in the strategies used to sample stimuli across dimensions, and these strategies may have an unrecognized influence on decision-making. Sex is a proxy for multiple genetic and endocrine influences on behavior, including how environments are sampled. In this study, we examined the strategies adopted by female and male mice as they learned the value of stimuli that varied in both image and location in a visually cued two-armed bandit, allowing two possible dimensions to learn about. Female mice acquired the correct image-value associations more quickly than male mice, preferring a fundamentally different strategy. Female mice were more likely to constrain their decision-space early in learning by preferentially sampling one location over which images varied. Conversely, male mice were more likely to be inconsistent, changing their choice frequently and responding to the immediate experience of stochastic rewards. Individual strategies were related to sex-biased changes in neuronal activation in early learning. Together, we find that in mice, sex is associated with divergent strategies for sampling and learning about the world, revealing substantial unrecognized variability in the approaches implemented during value-based decision making.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorConditioning, OperantFemaleMaleMiceModels, AnimalSex FactorsStochastic ProcessesTime Factorsdecision makingexplorationprefrontal cortexreinforcement learningsex differencesstrategy

Identifiers

PMID33125868
PMCPMC8120733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.