Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33125569›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Longitudinal Analysis of Quality-of-Life Recovery After Gastrectomy for Cancer.

Yinin Hu, Elvira L Vos, Raymond E Baser, Mark A Schattner, Makoto Nishimura, Daniel G Coit, Vivian E Strong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided proximal margin identification in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a randomized clinical trial.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Longitudinal assessment of quality-of-life after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Quality of life dynamics in the gastric cancer dyad: an actor-partner interdependence model analysis guiding the development of a family-centered nursing framework.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yinin HuDivision of General and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Elvira L VosDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Raymond E BaserDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mark A SchattnerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Makoto NishimuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel G CoitDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Vivian E StrongDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. strongv@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with quality-of-life recovery after gastrectomy.

methodsPatients anticipated to undergo gastric cancer resection were invited to complete the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 and STO22 surveys in the preoperative setting and at 0-1.5 months (early), > 1.5-6 months (intermediate), and > 6-18 months (late) following resection. Quality-of-life recovery was measured as paired differences between pre- and postoperative results. Multivariable linear regression identified factors associated with preoperative quality of life and degree of change following resection.

resultsAcross 393 participants, response rates at the intermediate and late postoperative time points were 58% (n = 228) and 71% (n = 277), respectively. Relative to baseline, median global health scale decreased in the early (- 15.1 pts, p < 0.001) and intermediate (- 3.6 pts, p = 0.02) time points, but recovered by the late time point (+ 1.2 pts, p = 0.411). Relative to distal/subtotal gastrectomy, proximal/total gastrectomy was associated with worse recovery in both the early and late time points. Surgical complications were associated with worse early recovery. Patients who presented with locally advanced tumors (T3-T4) had lower preoperative quality-of-life scores, and more readily recovered to baseline after surgery. A minimally invasive approach was not associated with postoperative recovery.

conclusionsMost patients recover to baseline within 1 year following major gastrectomy, and recovery is easier with more limited resections. Patients with locally advanced tumors tend to have poorer baseline quality of life, which may improve following resection.

Indexed as

GastrectomyQuality of LifeStomach NeoplasmsHumansPostoperative PeriodSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33125569
PMCPMC8354003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.