Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33125564›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2021

Comparison of the diagnostic performances of US-guided fine needle aspiration cytology and thyroglobulin measurement for lymph node metastases in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Rong-Bin Liu, Da-Lei Zhou, Bo-Heng Xu, Xin-Hua Yang, Qing Liu, Xiao Zhang, Tao Tang, Zu-Lu Ye, Yue Li

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rong-Bin Liu *Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Da-Lei Zhou *Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Bo-Heng XuDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Xin-Hua YangDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Qing LiuDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Xiao ZhangDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Tao TangDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Zu-Lu YeDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. yezl@sysucc.org.cn.
Yue LiDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. liyue2@sysucc.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3747-1482

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2020A1515010098Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2020A1515011374the Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province, China A2019116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUltrasound (US)-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and thyroglobulin measurement (FNA-Tg) are two common methods for confirming lymph node metastases (LNM) in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). This study aimed at comparing the diagnostic performance of FNAC, FNA-Tg alone, and in combination by means of a meta-analysis.

methodsEligible articles were selected according to predefined criteria, and their quality was evaluated as per the QUADAS-2 checklist. We calculated pooled sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive/negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and plotted the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve using the Meta-DiSc1.4 software.

resultsTwenty-one studies pooling 1662 malignant and 1279 benign LNs from 2712 patients with DTC were included. The results showed that FNAC was more specific (pooled Sp, 0.98) while FNA-Tg was more sensitive (pooled Se, 0.94). FNAC and FNAC+FNA-Tg performed better postoperatively than FNA-Tg, while FNA-Tg performed better preoperatively. The combination of FNAC and FNA-Tg could achieve a better diagnostic performance than each alone (DOR 446.00, area under the curve [AUC] 0.9862), no matter preoperatively (DOR 378.14, AUC 0.9879) or postoperatively (DOR 788.72, AUC 0.9930). Besides, the combination of FNAC and FNA-Tg/serum-Tg ratio obtained a higher Sp (0.98) than the combination of FNAC and FNA-Tg.

conclusionThe addition of FNA-Tg, especially the FNA-Tg/serum-Tg ratio, to FNAC could increase the diagnostic performance of LNM in both preoperative and postoperative patients with DTC. Since one test or test combinations could perform differently according to the clinical situation, the best-fitting test should be chosen accordingly. KEY POINTS: • FNAC is more specific than FNA-Tg while FNA-Tg is more sensitive than FNAC. • The combination of FNAC and FNA-Tg could achieve a better diagnostic performance than either alone, no matter preoperatively or postoperatively. • The combination of FNAC and FNA-Tg/serum-Tg ratio could reach a higher Sp than the combination of FNAC and FNA-Tg.

Indexed as

ThyroglobulinThyroid NeoplasmsBiopsy, Fine-NeedleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyThyroglobulinBiopsy, Fine needleDifferentiated thyroid carcinomaLymph nodesMeta-analysisThyroglobulin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.