Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33125558›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Three-dimension amide proton transfer MRI of rectal adenocarcinoma: correlation with pathologic prognostic factors and comparison with diffusion kurtosis imaging.

Weicui Chen, Ling Li, Zhaoxian Yan, Shaowei Hu, Jieping Feng, Guoqing Liu, Bo Liu, Xian Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prediction of Kirsten rat sarcoma (Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Weicui Chen *Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 111 Dade road, Xuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Ling Li *Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 111 Dade road, Xuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Zhaoxian YanDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 111 Dade road, Xuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Shaowei HuDepartment of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 111 Dade road, Xuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Jieping FengDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 111 Dade road, Xuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Guoqing LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 111 Dade road, Xuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Bo LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 111 Dade road, Xuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Xian LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 111 Dade road, Xuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China. liuxian74@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1662-477X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the utility of 3D amide proton transfer (APT) MRI in predicting pathologic factors for rectal adenocarcinoma, in comparison with diffusion kurtosis imaging.

methodsSixty-one patients with rectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this prospective study. 3D APT and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) were performed. Mean APT-weighted signal intensity (APTw SI), mean kurtosis (MK), mean diffusivity (MD), and ADC values of tumors were calculated on these maps. Pathological analysis included WHO grades, pT stages, pN stages, and extramural venous invasion (EMVI) status. Student's t test, Spearman correlation, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis were used for statistical analysis.

resultsHigh-grade rectal adenocarcinoma showed significantly higher mean APTw SI and MK values (2.771 ± 0.384 vs 2.108 ± 0.409, 1.167 ± 0.216 vs 1.045 ± 0.175, respectively; p < 0.05). T3 rectal adenocarcinoma demonstrated higher mean APTw SI and MK than T2 tumors (2.433 ± 0.467 vs 1.900 ± 0.302, p < 0.05). No kurtosis, diffusivity, and ADC differences were found between T2 and T3 tumors. Tumors with lymph node metastasis and EMVI involvement showed significantly higher mean APTw SI, MK. No difference was found in diffusivity and ADC between pN0 and pN1-2 groups, and EMVI-negative and EMVI-positive statuses. Mean APTw SI exhibited a significantly high positive correlation with WHO grades, demonstrating 92.31% sensitivity and 79.17% specificity for distinguishing low- from high-grade rectal adenocarcinoma, providing a better diagnostic capacity than MK, MD, and mean ADC values.

conclusion3D-APT could serve as a non-invasive biomarker for evaluating prognostic factors of rectal adenocarcinoma. KEY POINTS: • Mean APTw SI was significantly higher in high-grade compared to low-grade rectal adenocarcinoma. • Mean APTw SI was significantly higher in T3 stage rectal adenocarcinoma, with lymph node metastasis, or in EMVI-positive status. • APTw SI exhibited greater diagnostic capability in discriminating low-grade from high-grade rectal adenocarcinoma, compared with kurtosis, diffusivity, and ADC.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaProtonsAmidesDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrognosisProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAmidesProtonsAmidesDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingPathologyRectal neoplasm

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.