Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33125550›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2021

The combined self- and parent-rated SDQ score profile predicts care use and psychiatric diagnoses.

Jorien Vugteveen, Annelies de Bildt, Catharina A Hartman, Sijmen A Reijneveld, Marieke E Timmerman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jorien VugteveenHeymans Institute for Psychological Research, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.vugteveen@rug.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-4120
Annelies de BildtDepartment of Psychiatry, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4196-2404
Catharina A HartmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8094-8859
Sijmen A ReijneveldDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-7523
Marieke E TimmermanHeymans Institute for Psychological Research, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1579-6964
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

ZonMw 729300105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is widely used, based on evidence of its value for screening. This evidence primarily regards the single informant total difficulties scale and separate difficulties subscales. We assessed to what degree adolescents' SDQ profiles that combined all self- and parent-rated subscales were associated with use of care and psychiatric diagnoses, and examined the added value thereof over using only a single informant and the total scale. Cluster analysis was used to identify common SDQ profiles based on self- and parent-reports among adolescents aged 12-17 in mental healthcare (n = 4282), social care (n = 124), and the general population (n = 1293). We investigated associations of the profiles with 'care use' and 'DSM-IV diagnoses', depending on gender. We identified six common SDQ profiles: five profiles with varying types and severities of reported difficulties, pertaining to 95% of adolescents in care, and one without difficulties, pertaining to 55% of adolescents not in care. The types of reported difficulties in the profiles matched DSM-IV diagnoses for 88% of the diagnosed adolescents. The SDQ profiles were found to be more useful for predicting care use and diagnoses than SDQ scores reported by the adolescent as single informant and the total difficulties scale. The latter indicated the presence of problems among 42-63% of the adolescents in care, missing a substantial number of adolescents with reported emotional difficulties and borderline problem severity. These findings advocate the use of combined self- and parent-rated SDQ score profiles for screening.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersAdolescentDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersEmotionsHumansParentsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescent mental healthComorbidityMulti-informantThree-step multilevel mixture modelling

Identifiers

PMID33125550
PMCPMC8563533
OpenAlexW3095236416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.