Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33125494›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Perspectives of VA Primary Care Clinicians Toward Electronic Consultation-Related Workload Burden: A Qualitative Analysis.

Marcie Lee, Chelsea Leonard, Preston Greene, Rachael Kenney, Melanie D Whittington, Susan Kirsh, P Michael Ho, George Sayre, Joseph Simonetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Supporting Veterans, Caregivers, and Providers in Rural Regions With Tele-Geriatric Psychiatry Consultation: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marcie LeeDenver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora.
Chelsea LeonardDenver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora.
Preston GreeneDepartment of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle.
Rachael KenneyDenver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora.
Melanie D WhittingtonDenver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora.
Susan KirshOffice of Specialty Care and Specialty Care Transformation, Washington, DC.
P Michael HoDenver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora.
George SayreDepartment of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle.
Joseph SimonettiDenver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Electronic consultation (e-consultation) is increasingly being adopted to expand access to specialty care and reduce health care costs. Little is known about clinicians' perceptions of using e-consultations, which may be associated with program adoption. Objective: To identify perceptions of primary care clinicians in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system about e-consultation and workload. Design, Setting, and Participants: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews was conducted from September 2017 through March 2018 in a national sample of VHA primary care clinics in the US. Participants were primary care clinicians who had at least 300 total patient encounters from July 2016 to June 2017, including at least 1 e-consultation request. A convenience sample of participants was recruited using email invitations. Deductive and inductive content analysis were used to identify themes. Data were analyzed from October 2017 to April 2018. Exposures: Use of e-consultation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary care clinician perspectives regarding e-consultation and their workload. Results: A total of 34 primary care clinicians enrolled working across 27 VHA clinical sites were included; 9 (26%) were between ages 40-49 years; 23 (68%) were female. Three themes were identified. First, the process of entering, tracking, and following up on e-consultations added a time burden to primary care clinicians. Second, e-consultation was perceived to shift diagnostic and follow-up responsibilities from specialists to primary care clinicians. Third, e-consultations were thought to improve the timeliness and quality of care provided despite a perceived increase in workload. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, participants perceived e-consultation as valuable for patient care but also as an increase in their workload. Further work is warranted to quantify the workload increase on clinician burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to ComputersAdultElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationUnited StatesVeterans Health ServicesWorkload

Identifiers

PMID33125494
PMCPMC7599439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.