Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33125370›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2020

Transcriptome and epigenome diversity and plasticity of muscle stem cells following transplantation.

Brendan Evano, Diljeet Gill, Irene Hernando-Herraez, Glenda Comai, Thomas M Stubbs, Pierre-Henri Commere, Wolf Reik, Shahragim Tajbakhsh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The impact of cellular senescence on aging skeletal muscle.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Insights and perspectives on the enigmatic alary muscles of arthropods.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Exercise/Resistance Training and Muscle Stem Cells.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Hox Proteins in the Regulation of Muscle Development.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Brendan EvanoStem Cells & Development, Department of Developmental & Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr. Roux, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6075-0418
Diljeet GillEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5725-2466
Irene Hernando-HerraezEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Glenda ComaiStem Cells & Development, Department of Developmental & Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr. Roux, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3244-3378
Thomas M StubbsEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2990-7381
Pierre-Henri CommereCytometry and Biomarkers, Center for Technological Resources and Research, Institut Pasteur, 28 rue du Dr. Roux, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3886-4256
Wolf ReikEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0216-9881
Shahragim TajbakhshStem Cells & Development, Department of Developmental & Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr. Roux, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1809-7202
Babraham Institute · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Pasteur · FR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council CBBS/E/B/000C0425Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult skeletal muscles are maintained during homeostasis and regenerated upon injury by muscle stem cells (MuSCs). A heterogeneity in self-renewal, differentiation and regeneration properties has been reported for MuSCs based on their anatomical location. Although MuSCs derived from extraocular muscles (EOM) have a higher regenerative capacity than those derived from limb muscles, the molecular determinants that govern these differences remain undefined. Here we show that EOM and limb MuSCs have distinct DNA methylation signatures associated with enhancers of location-specific genes, and that the EOM transcriptome is reprogrammed following transplantation into a limb muscle environment. Notably, EOM MuSCs expressed host-site specific positional Hox codes after engraftment and self-renewal within the host muscle. However, about 10% of EOM-specific genes showed engraftment-resistant expression, pointing to cell-intrinsic molecular determinants of the higher engraftment potential of EOM MuSCs. Our results underscore the molecular diversity of distinct MuSC populations and molecularly define their plasticity in response to microenvironmental cues. These findings provide insights into strategies designed to improve the functional capacity of MuSCs in the context of regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell PlasticityCell ProliferationEpigenomeExtremitiesGenetic VariationHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMuscle CellsMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalMyoblasts

Identifiers

PMID33125370
PMCPMC7657492
OpenAlexW3096349398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.